Mozservice postmortem

From MozillaWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
  • What we did well
    • Overall: All the stakeholders were involved in the planning stages and had an opportunity to voice opinions.
    • WebDev:
      • Initial planning was helpful & thorough
      • Sync'd up well on bug triaging & judgement calls
      • Good teamwork & cohesiveness
      • Austin ROCKED!
    • QA:
      • Really involved from the get go and knew what to test.
      • Super seamless
      • Found a crazy amount of bugs :)
      • Went above and beyond in terms of testing partner sites and overall experience.
    • Partner:
      • Critical as we weren't familiar with the space.
      • Social Actions was a wonderful extension of the team -- understood Mozilla perspective and acted with best interests.
      • Great management of all the friends that signed up (thanks to Mike!)
      • Great breadth of partners and good fit.
      • Idealist was a great fit and mission was aligned well with us
        • Both Idealist and BP did a great job promoting and put a lot of time and resources into this.
      • Did a great job getting the word out.
      • OneWebDay:
        • Great as bookending party
        • 40 - 50 submissions and a lot of participants. Great inventory of photos and first time anything went viral.
      • Templates:
        • Great to have those tools handy and great followup. (Chelsea to pull stats)
      • Foundation:
        • Good timing on mozilla.org relaunch & causes pages
        • Good collaboration across entities and erasing the boundaries
  • What we didn't so well
    • Overall:
      • Perhaps too open ended with call to action.
    • User experience:
      • Flow and hand off was tough and confusing.
    • L10n:
      • Didn't schedule hard fast deadlines with team
      • Too many last minute changes with copy
      • Should have had just two sets of changes
      • Confusing from QA stand point as to what was going out and when.
    • Scheduling:
      • Slip in date was tough on partners
      • Lost PR momentum -- soft launch + then later push didn't work
      • Hard maintaining momentum in general
      • OneWebDay:
        • Confusion over whether this was a OneWebDay or Mozilla Service Week.
        • Bit off too much with OneWebDay
  • What we do different next time
    • Overall:
      • More focus -- we were a bit scattered with OneWebDay
      • Consider cause as the "Web" which narrower and encourage more people to participate vs. just the Mozilla community.
    • Partners:
      • Need to better set expectations with Idealist and/or partner.
      • Better accommodate ways for people to self organize around things they care about. (Didn't anticipate how much people would want to do their own thing)
      • Target partners that are better at mobilizing large groups of volunteers
    • Foundation:
      • Would great to kick off collaboration from the beginning. We only got Chelsea half way in!
    • Metrics:
      • Expose both pledged and completed hours at same time.
    • Volunteer Opportunities
      • Mismatch between what NPOs needed & what volunteers could accomplish in a few hours. Need to step back and help NPOs articulate needs in a digestible way for volunteers. Much more rigorous and informed way to get NPOs to list opps.
        • Create more templated approach on Idealist
        • Educate NPOS
      • Organize regional activities that tie into our cause.
      • More open source/web-related projects
    • Better organizational buy in
      • Get internal champion & team leads to set examples
  • Key stats
    • Mozilla:
      • Roughly 450 stories
      • 13,700 pledged hours
      • 969,275 page views
      • 2860 registrants -- need to do breakdown between orgs & volunteers
    • From Idealist:
      • New nonprofits registered:
        • EN: 342
        • ES: 27
        • FR: 78
      • Total vol opportunities in all languages:
        • 4,323 (of which 92% were EN)
        • EN: 3381
        • ES: 244
        • FR: 98
      • Traffic stats:
        • 52,579 people visited mozservice09.idealist.org
        • That site had a total of 308,238 page views and there was an average of 3:35 time spent on the site.
        • Most of the traffic came from the following countries: US (31,793 visits), France (8,352 visits), Argentina (3,277) followed by the UK, Canada, Spain, India, Mexico, Colombia and Australia.
        • On the three sites (one for each language) we set up for helping nonprofits post tech volunteer opportunities, there were 3,343 visits from 95 countries/territories. And the pages on these sites were viewed a total of 10,452 times.
    • From Betterplace:
      • Betterplace received 50 opportunities posted
      • Betterplace had 6,000 visits and 24 opportunities fulfilled