Mozservice postmortem
From MozillaWiki
- What we did well
- Overall: All the stakeholders were involved in the planning stages and had an opportunity to voice opinions.
- WebDev:
- Initial planning was helpful & thorough
- Sync'd up well on bug triaging & judgement calls
- Good teamwork & cohesiveness
- Austin ROCKED!
- QA:
- Really involved from the get go and knew what to test.
- Super seamless
- Found a crazy amount of bugs :)
- Went above and beyond in terms of testing partner sites and overall experience.
- Partner:
- Critical as we weren't familiar with the space.
- Social Actions was a wonderful extension of the team -- understood Mozilla perspective and acted with best interests.
- Great management of all the friends that signed up (thanks to Mike!)
- Great breadth of partners and good fit.
- Idealist was a great fit and mission was aligned well with us
- Both Idealist and BP did a great job promoting and put a lot of time and resources into this.
- Did a great job getting the word out.
- OneWebDay:
- Great as bookending party
- 40 - 50 submissions and a lot of participants. Great inventory of photos and first time anything went viral.
- Templates:
- Great to have those tools handy and great followup. (Chelsea to pull stats)
- Foundation:
- Good timing on mozilla.org relaunch & causes pages
- Good collaboration across entities and erasing the boundaries
- What we didn't so well
- Overall:
- Perhaps too open ended with call to action.
- User experience:
- Flow and hand off was tough and confusing.
- L10n:
- Didn't schedule hard fast deadlines with team
- Too many last minute changes with copy
- Should have had just two sets of changes
- Confusing from QA stand point as to what was going out and when.
- Scheduling:
- Slip in date was tough on partners
- Lost PR momentum -- soft launch + then later push didn't work
- Hard maintaining momentum in general
- OneWebDay:
- Confusion over whether this was a OneWebDay or Mozilla Service Week.
- Bit off too much with OneWebDay
- Overall:
- What we do different next time
- Overall:
- More focus -- we were a bit scattered with OneWebDay
- Consider cause as the "Web" which narrower and encourage more people to participate vs. just the Mozilla community.
- Overall:
- Partners:
- Need to better set expectations with Idealist and/or partner.
- Better accommodate ways for people to self organize around things they care about. (Didn't anticipate how much people would want to do their own thing)
- Target partners that are better at mobilizing large groups of volunteers
- Partners:
- Foundation:
- Would great to kick off collaboration from the beginning. We only got Chelsea half way in!
- Foundation:
- Metrics:
- Expose both pledged and completed hours at same time.
- Metrics:
- Volunteer Opportunities
- Mismatch between what NPOs needed & what volunteers could accomplish in a few hours. Need to step back and help NPOs articulate needs in a digestible way for volunteers. Much more rigorous and informed way to get NPOs to list opps.
- Create more templated approach on Idealist
- Educate NPOS
- Organize regional activities that tie into our cause.
- More open source/web-related projects
- Mismatch between what NPOs needed & what volunteers could accomplish in a few hours. Need to step back and help NPOs articulate needs in a digestible way for volunteers. Much more rigorous and informed way to get NPOs to list opps.
- Volunteer Opportunities
- Better organizational buy in
- Get internal champion & team leads to set examples
- Better organizational buy in
- Key stats
- Mozilla:
- Roughly 450 stories
- 13,700 pledged hours
- 969,275 page views
- 2860 registrants -- need to do breakdown between orgs & volunteers
- Mozilla:
- From Idealist:
- New nonprofits registered:
- EN: 342
- ES: 27
- FR: 78
- Total vol opportunities in all languages:
- 4,323 (of which 92% were EN)
- EN: 3381
- ES: 244
- FR: 98
- Traffic stats:
- 52,579 people visited mozservice09.idealist.org
- That site had a total of 308,238 page views and there was an average of 3:35 time spent on the site.
- Most of the traffic came from the following countries: US (31,793 visits), France (8,352 visits), Argentina (3,277) followed by the UK, Canada, Spain, India, Mexico, Colombia and Australia.
- On the three sites (one for each language) we set up for helping nonprofits post tech volunteer opportunities, there were 3,343 visits from 95 countries/territories. And the pages on these sites were viewed a total of 10,452 times.
- New nonprofits registered:
- From Betterplace:
- Betterplace received 50 opportunities posted
- Betterplace had 6,000 visits and 24 opportunities fulfilled
- From Idealist: