Firefox2/StatusMeetings/2006-06-20: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
<small>[[Firefox2/StatusMeetings/2006-06-13|<< previous week]] | [[Firefox2/StatusMeetings|index]] | [[Firefox2/StatusMeetings/2006-06-29|next week>>]]</small>
<small>[[Firefox2/StatusMeetings/2006-06-13|<< previous week]] | [[Firefox2/StatusMeetings|index]] | [[Firefox2/StatusMeetings/2006-07-06|next week>>]]</small>


'''Meeting Details'''
'''Meeting Details'''
Line 32: Line 32:
** brettw: I'm rewriting a big chunk of it right now
** brettw: I'm rewriting a big chunk of it right now


* mconnor: also, we're in branch lockdown, so no more landing on the branch without branch-approval1.8.1+!
* mconnor: also, we're in branch lockdown, so no more landing on the branch without approval1.8.1+ !


Current target dates:
Current target dates:
Line 84: Line 84:


=== Search: UI ===
=== Search: UI ===
* landed first version of new add-new-engine UI ({{Bug|336452}})
* additional, lower-priority dialog refinements probably won't make beta1 ({{Bug|341668}}, {{Bug|341669}})
* changing direction of search-engine popup menu ({{Bug|339735}}) in review
* UI design for searchbar buttons (no bug; related to {{Bug|341429}}) and announcement of new autodetected engines ({{Bug|339735}}) in progress, I hear, but not ready for implementation


=== Search: Plugin Format ===
=== Search: Plugin Format ===
* search plugin descriptions and icons can now be accessed by FTP ({{Bug|342010}})
* widow/sidebar.addSearchEngine() accepts now OpenSearch plugins as well as Sherlock ({{Bug|341665}})


=== Distribution: Installer ===
=== Distribution: Installer ===
Line 115: Line 122:


=== L10n ===
=== L10n ===
* phil: going to circulate (either today or tomorrow) a requirements document for l10n that largely clarifies what people are thinking about. Goals are to get en-US and t1 locales (about 10-15) in comparable quality state. Hopefully there won't be a big surprise. However, if you've got a new feature and you haven't been considering l10n impact, then you should probably get in touch with me by email. Biggest single blocker is the installer {{bug|340173}} at the moment.
* [mailto:phil@of.net phil]: going to circulate (either today or tomorrow) a requirements document for l10n that largely clarifies what people are thinking about.
** Chief goal: ship Fx2 with en-US and t1 locales (about 10-15) of comparable quality
** Hopefully the document won't be a big surprise. Mostly clarifying.
** However, if you've got a new feature and you haven't been considering l10n impact, then you should probably get in touch with me by [mailto:phil@off.net email]
* Biggest single blocker is the installer {{bug|340173}} at the moment.
* Be prepared to QA a few dozen fields in hundreds of localized builds.  I don't see how it's possible without some automation.
** davel: we're going to need to work with the localizers to do testing, too.
** davel: we're going to need to work with the localizers to do testing, too.


Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
3,599

edits