Mozilla2:ImageLib: Difference between revisions

Video argue
No edit summary
(Video argue)
Line 24: Line 24:
The next step in animated images is full video support.
The next step in animated images is full video support.
Is built in support for video formats a requirement for a browser?
Is built in support for video formats a requirement for a browser?
* Most possibly no, it should be kept separate module to enable updates to support new formats not only with full browser update.
* Should there be support for video-specific tags? <tt><img DynSrc=...</tt>