Firefox/Beta/2011-08-29 - Revision history

Clegnitto: /* Next beta build */

2011-08-29T23:48:16Z

Next beta build

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:48, 29 August 2011
Line 9:		Line 9:
	* Do we wait until Wednesday or rush it because of the [http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2011/08/29/fraudulent-google-com-certificate/ cert issue]		* Do we wait until Wednesday or rush it because of the [http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2011/08/29/fraudulent-google-com-certificate/ cert issue]
	** Decided to rush it, even though having beta users "exposed" for an extra 24/48 hours wouldn't be super horrible (release users are generally thought to be most important)		** Decided to rush it, even though having beta users "exposed" for an extra 24/48 hours wouldn't be super horrible (release users are generally thought to be most important)
			** Decided it was lower priority than release channels though
			** Mentioned that Nightly and Aurora should get the fix automatically due to automation
	* Do we want to make it 7.0b2 + the 1 fix or do we want to take everything else that has landed?		* Do we want to make it 7.0b2 + the 1 fix or do we want to take everything else that has landed?
	** Decided to take tip of mozilla-beta		** Decided to take tip of mozilla-beta

2011-08-29T23:36:49Z

Next beta build

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:36, 29 August 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:
	== Next beta build ==		== Next beta build ==
	* Do we wait until Wednesday or rush it because of the [http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2011/08/29/fraudulent-google-com-certificate/ cert issue]		* Do we wait until Wednesday or rush it because of the [http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2011/08/29/fraudulent-google-com-certificate/ cert issue]
	** Decided to rush it, even though having beta users "exposed" for an extra 24/48 hours wouldn't be super horrible (release users are generally ~~thoughtmost~~ important)		** Decided to rush it, even though having beta users "exposed" for an extra 24/48 hours wouldn't be super horrible (release users are generally thought to be most important)
	* Do we want to make it 7.0b2 + the 1 fix or do we want to take everything else that has landed?		* Do we want to make it 7.0b2 + the 1 fix or do we want to take everything else that has landed?
	** Decided to take tip of mozilla-beta		** Decided to take tip of mozilla-beta

2011-08-29T23:30:27Z

Stability Status

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:30, 29 August 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:
	* Feedback about the way we are tracking Linux/Android crashes		* Feedback about the way we are tracking Linux/Android crashes
	** smooney says they are going to start breaking down by platform, not exactly sure what they will look like		** smooney says they are going to start breaking down by platform, not exactly sure what they will look like

			== Next beta build ==
			* Do we wait until Wednesday or rush it because of the [http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2011/08/29/fraudulent-google-com-certificate/ cert issue]
			** Decided to rush it, even though having beta users "exposed" for an extra 24/48 hours wouldn't be super horrible (release users are generally thoughtmost important)
			* Do we want to make it 7.0b2 + the 1 fix or do we want to take everything else that has landed?
			** Decided to take tip of mozilla-beta
			** Decided we need to test these fixes anyway and Beta users should be a little more risk tolerant

			== Meeting about meetings ==
			* Deferred until later, we'll maintain the status quo for now

2011-08-29T21:17:55Z

Stability Status

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:17, 29 August 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* Not sure how the GC frequency change affects crashes		* Not sure how the GC frequency change affects crashes
	* smooney says she needs to dig in more		* smooney says she needs to dig in more
	* #22 Lion OSServices crasher		* #22 Lion OSServices crasher still there, we will poke Apple
			* Feedback about the way we are tracking Linux/Android crashes
			** smooney says they are going to start breaking down by platform, not exactly sure what they will look like

2011-08-29T21:12:30Z

Stability Status

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:12, 29 August 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* Not sure how the GC frequency change affects crashes		* Not sure how the GC frequency change affects crashes
	* smooney says she needs to dig in more		* smooney says she needs to dig in more
			* #22 Lion OSServices crasher

2011-08-29T21:08:26Z

Stability Status

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:08, 29 August 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Stability Status ==		== Stability Status ==
			* Not sure how the GC frequency change affects crashes
			* smooney says she needs to dig in more

2011-08-29T20:53:35Z

Created page with "== Stability Status =="

New page

== Stability Status ==