Firefox:1.5.0.10-2.0.0.2:Test Plan:l10n: Difference between revisions

Line 27: Line 27:


==== Windows ====
==== Windows ====
* Locale: da '''result'''
* Locale: da '''PASS'''
* Platform: Win (XP, Vista, 2000, 98)
* Platform: Win (Vista)
* Build ID:  
* Build ID: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; da; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070215 Firefox/2.0.0.2 ID:2007021518
* Tester and date: Tomcat
* Tester and date: Tomcat
* Notes:
* Notes: results in litmus - looks good


* Locale: de '''PASS'''
* Locale: de '''PASS'''
Line 38: Line 38:
* Tester and date: Tomcat
* Tester and date: Tomcat
* Notes:no read-only profile files
* Notes:no read-only profile files
* Locale: de '''PASS'''
* Platform: Win (Vista)
* Build ID: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; de; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070215 Firefox/2.0.0.2 ID:2007021518
* Tester and date: Tomcat
* Notes:no read-only profile files - looks good - results in litmus


* Locale: es-ES '''PASS'''
* Locale: es-ES '''PASS'''
Line 44: Line 50:
* Tester and date: juanb
* Tester and date: juanb
* Notes: First run and start pages look ok.
* Notes: First run and start pages look ok.
* Locale: es-ES '''PASS'''
* Platform: Win (Vista)
* Build ID: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; es-ES; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070215 Firefox/2.0.0.2 ID:2007021518
* Tester and date: tomcat
* Notes: looks good - results in litmus


* Locale: fr '''result'''
* Locale: fr '''result'''
Confirmed users
2,317

edits