Mozilla2:ImageLib: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Patents on jpeg2k?)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


Isn't that illegal? JPEG2000 is heavily patented IIRC. Unless somebody's going to buy off the rights holders. And I didn't think mozilla.org had THAT sort of money. Anyway nobody uses JPEG2000, for this exact reason.
Isn't that illegal? JPEG2000 is heavily patented IIRC. Unless somebody's going to buy off the rights holders. And I didn't think mozilla.org had THAT sort of money. Anyway nobody uses JPEG2000, for this exact reason.
Why not just read the [[http://www.jpeg.org/faq.phtml?action=show_answer&question_id=q3f042a68b1081| JPEG2000 faq on patents]] instead of FUD-ing?
1

edit