Reps/SOPs/Budget: Difference between revisions

(Styling)
(→‎Disqualification of Budget Requests: Basic information summary)
Line 36: Line 36:


This 3-week “buffer” guarantees that each budget request undergoes the same thorough selection process.
This 3-week “buffer” guarantees that each budget request undergoes the same thorough selection process.
<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: rgb(255, 242, 204); border-width: 1px; border-color: rgb(255, 217, 102); border-style: solid;">
'''Budgets that don't reply to the basic information asked in this SOP will be moved back to mentor review.'''
Basic information to be provided:
<ol>
<li>Which functional area goals is this supporting and how?</li>
<li>What are the event goals? What's success for this event? How are you going to measure it?</li>
<li>Why this budget is needed for the success of the event?</li>
<li>Detailed agenda (what are we doing, activities to support the event goals)</li>
<li>[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/1/d/12FDeW3Qd5M2Mfpr8e7edCfXcUtqHP3lh3xwSln8w4G4/edit?usp=drive_web Budget breakdown] attached to the bug once created (who are we covering?)</li>
<li>Are there "optional" costs not needed for the success of the event? Which ones? What the minimum viable budget?</li>
</ol>
</div>


{{admon/important |Receipts from previous budget requests| Make sure that you have attached all of your receipts at your previous budget requests. Reps that haven't submitted previous receipts will not be able to request budget for their new events.}}
{{admon/important |Receipts from previous budget requests| Make sure that you have attached all of your receipts at your previous budget requests. Reps that haven't submitted previous receipts will not be able to request budget for their new events.}}
Confirmed users
373

edits