Support/Weekly Meetings/Minutes 2008-10-20: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<small>[[Support|Support]] » [[Support/Weekly_Meetings|Weekly Meetings]] » 2008-10-20</small>
<small>[[Support|Support]] » [[Support/Weekly_Meetings|Weekly Meetings]] » 2008-10-20</small>


'''Attendees:''' djst, cilias, zzxc, cww,  
'''Attendees:''' djst, cilias, zzxc, cww, nkoth


'''Sumo'''
'''Sumo'''
* [http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=piA-a-dXCL2p7vB5pTu0HKA&hl=en Weekly metrics]
* [http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=piA-a-dXCL2p7vB5pTu0HKA&hl=en Weekly metrics]
* [http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Weekly+common+issues Last week's weekly support issues]
* [http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Weekly+common+issues Last week's weekly support issues]
** Norton 360, cww takes the lead
** Corrupt places.sqlite issue - cww to file bug and write KB article on how to replace the file
** sqlite issue - cww to file bug and write article
** zzxc says some people experience the prefs not saving issue with Norton 360. Disabling 360 solves the problem. Need to talk to Norton about that.  
** zzxc says some people experience the not saving issues due to norton360,  prefs not saving with norton360.. disabling 360 did.  
* Top understandable articles generally have only "Yes" votes on the other question "Did this article solve a problem you had with Firefox?"
* top understandable  
* CSAT data for KB -- cww will look into it this week to give us an average
* csat cww will look into it  


'''Knowledge Base'''
'''Knowledge Base'''
Line 16: Line 15:
* Bugzilla: no activity
* Bugzilla: no activity
* 270+ articles with no language set [http://support.mozilla.com/tiki-listpages.php?offset=0&sort_mode=lang_asc&maxRecords=278]: If you can help assign languages, that would be appreciated.
* 270+ articles with no language set [http://support.mozilla.com/tiki-listpages.php?offset=0&sort_mode=lang_asc&maxRecords=278]: If you can help assign languages, that would be appreciated.
** nelson to look into it this week. need to test with non-admin acounts
** nkoth to look into it this week. djst to to test with non-admin acount
* We're going to use SHOWFOR for Firefox 3.1 content. [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457027]
* We're going to use SHOWFOR for Firefox 3.1 content. [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457027]
* Looking for ways to determine who to promote to approver (if other people are reviewing edits, how do we become aware of who should be promoted?)
* Looking for ways to determine who to promote to reviewer (if other people are reviewing edits, how do we become aware of who should be promoted?)
**  
** It feels like a potential reviewer should want to become one -- that should be the first step (request to become one), at which point we could review that person's past edits (djst)
** Nominate
** Have other reviewers nominate good article editors (cww)
** Should promote the idea of  
** Generally, we should promote the idea of having people reviewing other people's edits. It should be the norm for new articles or significant edits.


'''Support Forum'
'''Support Forum'
1,623

edits