Confirmed users
1,094
edits
Firefox/AddOns/Status/current: Difference between revisions
→Exec Summary/Hot Topics - Oct 10th: y
Sescalante (talk | contribs) (→Focused WebExtension APIs: update) |
Sescalante (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
**roughly 6.41% of Beta users qualified: 56,000 in test group and 56,000 in control group | **roughly 6.41% of Beta users qualified: 56,000 in test group and 56,000 in control group | ||
**Listed add-on counts that meet the target population criteria are at the top of [http://arewee10syet.com/ arewee10syet.] ~1900 | **Listed add-on counts that meet the target population criteria are at the top of [http://arewee10syet.com/ arewee10syet.] ~1900 | ||
**First few weeks of Beta 50 have shown no issues created by the add-on/e10s inclusion with [https://sql.telemetry.mozilla.org/dashboard/stability-metrics-for-e10s-add-ons-experiment-beta-49-50-51- Stability] or [https://github.com/mozilla/e10s_analyses/blob/master/beta/50/week1/e10s_experiment.ipynbPerformance]. | **First few weeks of Beta 50 have shown no issues created by the add-on/e10s inclusion with [https://sql.telemetry.mozilla.org/dashboard/stability-metrics-for-e10s-add-ons-experiment-beta-49-50-51- Stability] or [https://github.com/mozilla/e10s_analyses/blob/master/beta/50/week1/e10s_experiment.ipynbPerformance]. | ||
**In 50 MPC:true was adjusted to also [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1214824 block CPOW usage] (in addition to shims). Only a few add-ons that had already used CPOWs directly were excluded for a brief transition period. | **In 50 MPC:true was adjusted to also [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1214824 block CPOW usage] (in addition to shims). Only a few add-ons that had already used CPOWs directly were excluded for a brief transition period. | ||