Thunderbird/Driver Meetings/2011-04-12: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Account Provisioning, Open Search, & priorities | * Account Provisioning, Open Search, & priorities | ||
** Meeting with a third party went well. | |||
** They want a way to set defaults for a build they distribute. | |||
* Miramar (3.3) | * Miramar (3.3) | ||
** Resyncing with Firefox 5.0 release. | ** Resyncing with Firefox 5.0 release. | ||
** Lots of release mechanics to think about. | ** Lots of release mechanics to think about. | ||
** We probably shouldn't use Aurora to do our development work on. | |||
*** We might need more hardware for the new branches. | |||
*** We would still have the canary system to tell when to pull m-c into c-c. | |||
** Should we jump on the repo train for 3.3? | |||
*** We don't know, but we're leaning towards yes. | |||
*** Bugs will be filed. | |||
* Stability & Security Releases | * Stability & Security Releases | ||
| Line 14: | Line 22: | ||
* Conversion funnel | * Conversion funnel | ||
** Need to co-ordinate with Sancus. | |||
** Talked to someone on metrics about looking at numbers. | |||
== Attendees == | == Attendees == | ||
Latest revision as of 16:34, 12 April 2011
Notetaker
bwinton
Agenda & Notes
- Account Provisioning, Open Search, & priorities
- Meeting with a third party went well.
- They want a way to set defaults for a build they distribute.
- Miramar (3.3)
- Resyncing with Firefox 5.0 release.
- Lots of release mechanics to think about.
- We probably shouldn't use Aurora to do our development work on.
- We might need more hardware for the new branches.
- We would still have the canary system to tell when to pull m-c into c-c.
- Should we jump on the repo train for 3.3?
- We don't know, but we're leaning towards yes.
- Bugs will be filed.
- Stability & Security Releases
- Revised schedule, starting builds this week.
- Conversion funnel
- Need to co-ordinate with Sancus.
- Talked to someone on metrics about looking at numbers.