Release Management/Release Notes Process

From MozillaWiki
< Release Management
Revision as of 17:41, 1 November 2011 by Akeybl (talk | contribs) (Created page with "This is a proposal for the process by which we construct release notes, but does not represent a final decision. === Release/Channel Specific Notes === Can be displayed above "W...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is a proposal for the process by which we construct release notes, but does not represent a final decision.

Release/Channel Specific Notes

Can be displayed above "What's New" - please get in contact with Alex to change these.

What's New Section

(channel) notes for Firefox (n) should be pulled from

  • bugs keyworded with "relnote"

OR

OR

  • An email to Alex

OR

  • has patch with approval-mozilla-(channel) added since the last merge date
  • status-firefox(n) is "fixed"

Known Issues Section

Let's say we're about to push Firefox (n) to Aurora. To find known issues, we should look at all bugs that are

  • status-firefox(n) is "affected" or "wontfix"
  • tracking-firefox(n) is "?" or "+", or tracking-firefox(n+1) is "?" or "+"

OR

  • keyworded with "relnote" (perhaps this should be an approval flag)

If a bug is keyworded/flagged with "relnote", the requestor can additionally specify whether or not additional testing is required, and if so, where bugs should be filed.

Updating Release Notes

All "Known Issues" (bugs) that do not have a fix date in the DB should be checked to see if they've subsequently been resolved in a newer Firefox version. This needs to happen on a weekly basis, since that's the cadence for Aurora/Beta.