Confirmed users
455
edits
User:Shaver/AMO Extension Policy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
User:Shaver/AMO Extension Policy (view source)
Revision as of 16:44, 28 November 2006
, 28 November 2006binary components and reviews
No edit summary |
(binary components and reviews) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
All listings, content, positioning, and availability of add-ons and related material on AMO is at the discretion of Mozilla, and Mozilla reserves the right to remove or modify such material as it deems necessary and appropriate to serve the interests of the project and its users. | All listings, content, positioning, and availability of add-ons and related material on AMO is at the discretion of Mozilla, and Mozilla reserves the right to remove or modify such material as it deems necessary and appropriate to serve the interests of the project and its users. | ||
= Code review and binary components = | |||
The administrators and reviewers on AMO may reject an add-on submission if it contains code that is obfuscated in such a way as to impair review (whether intentionally or not). Compiled code is obviously difficult to review, and as such add-ons may be rejected or kept in "admin purgatory" until Mozilla is satisfied that it does not present undue risk to users. Add-on authors who feel that they have a compelling case for approval of their binary-including add-on should make that case in a bug or mail message (address TBD), and should expect that their request will be looked at with a very critical eye. Any add-on with a binary component should be signed by the author, as well. | |||
= Descriptions and add-on naming = | = Descriptions and add-on naming = | ||