Talk:Firefox:1.5 Network Error Messages: Difference between revisions
		
		
		
		
		
		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		
				
		
		
	
mNo edit summary  | 
				mNo edit summary  | 
				||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
--[[User:Wrprice|Wrprice]] 12:39, 28 Jul 2005 (PDT)  | --[[User:Wrprice|Wrprice]] 12:39, 28 Jul 2005 (PDT)  | ||
I get the [[Firefox:1.5_Network_Error_Messages#connectionFailure|connectionFailure  | I get the [[Firefox:1.5_Network_Error_Messages#connectionFailure|connectionFailure]] error when trying to connect to a site that returns connection refused.  This should be more specific that the connection was refused.<br>  | ||
--[[User:Xalimar|Xalimar]] 17:25, 8 Nov 2005 (PDT)  | --[[User:Xalimar|Xalimar]] 17:25, 8 Nov 2005 (PDT)  | ||
Revision as of 01:28, 9 November 2005
A few suggestions:
- Do not use contractions in title/heading
 - I could be just missing something, but is there really a case where the malformedURI message will appear such that the address bar will contain unescaped backslashes ot spaces?
 - Don't ask user to speculate. Questions like "Is your computer..." and "Do you have access..." sound fine, but:
- "Could the site be temporarily unavailable?" -> "The site may be temporarily unavailable."
 - "Could the file have been moved, renamed or deleted?" -> "The file may have been moved, renamed or deleted."
 
 
--Tuukka 01:33, 27 Jul 2005 (PDT)
Tuukka:
- Contractions were used because it reads a little friendlier / less formal than "cannot" or "is not". I know that style guides discourage it, but when I was putting these together last night, it just seemed so heavy to have "cannot". Let me mull that a bit.
 - Changed
 
--04:49, 28 Jul 2005 (PDT)
The contractions in the body/bullets doesn't bother me too much; however, I find the contractions in the headlines (underlined phrases) to be annoying.  I think the headline should be a bit more formal. Something to consider. 
--Wrprice 12:39, 28 Jul 2005 (PDT)
I get the connectionFailure error when trying to connect to a site that returns connection refused.  This should be more specific that the connection was refused.
--Xalimar 17:25, 8 Nov 2005 (PDT)