Firefox/Aurora/2011-05-26: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
==Beta Crashes==
==Beta Crashes==
* Not really meant to be part of this meeting but we have identified a number of top crashes that did regress in 5.0. These are not new signatures but our research has found a significant increase in volume.
* Not really meant to be part of this meeting but we have identified a number of top crashes that did regress in 5.0. These are not new signatures but our research has found a significant increase in volume.
** [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645775 Bug 645775]
** [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645775 Bug 645775] - checked in a patch we thinks fixes this.
** [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=602803 Bug 602803]
** [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=605033 Bug 605033] - checked a patch into Beta.
** [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595635 Bug 595635]

Revision as of 04:08, 27 May 2011

Agenda

  • Status
    • Firefox 6.0a2 Nightly -> Aurora Merge being tested by QA -- no major issues found -- expect sign-off by EOD tomorrow (ashughes)
      • Plan to start the release process on Friday @ 10:00am.
      • Updates should be available from 5.0a2 -> 6.0a2.
        • Will probably be available around noon PDT.
      • John O will file a bug. We would like the updates ready before 10:00am tomorrow.
    • l10n: which locales are based on m-c, and which locales are based on aurora (axel, joduinn)
      • for technical testing, we know we want at least "ar" and "en-US" on mozilla-central
    • move aurora, beta repo/remove symlinks finished last night. Done. (joduinn) bug 652229
  • Triage
    • Can we steal a piece of the Aurora triage time to take a look at the stability situation and crasher tracking bugs for the Beta channel? I think we have a more pressing set of concerns there than we do with early Aurora triage. - Asa

Action Items

  • Enable updates on auroratest for FF5.0a2-->FF6.0a2. bug 660086
  • l10n: which locales are based on m-c, and which locales are based on aurora (axel, joduinn)

Beta Crashes

  • Not really meant to be part of this meeting but we have identified a number of top crashes that did regress in 5.0. These are not new signatures but our research has found a significant increase in volume.