SeaMonkey:Reasons: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Fix table) |
(Change from table (can't have bullets) to headers) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
--> | --> | ||
=Developers= | |||
==biesi== | |||
==Stefan Borggraefe== | |||
==Ben Bucksch== | |||
===Reasons to keep SeaMonkey=== | |||
Developed 2 browsers based on it and need to keep them thriving | |||
===Problems with Firefox=== | |||
* Extreme instability code-wise (impossible to base derivates on it) | |||
* [http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsblame.cgi?file=mozilla/browser/Attic/README.html&rev=1.10&root=/cvsroot 'We're not accepting patches'] shows [http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:Ir8kaQgapxAJ:weblogs.mozillazine.org/ben/archives/005275.html general attitude of some developers] | |||
===Desired changes to SeaMonkey=== | |||
* Leaner UI (at least removing redundant UI) | |||
* make browser and mail client different processes | |||
==bz== | |||
==Neil Rashbrook== | |||
Revision as of 18:05, 11 March 2005
I'd like to understand the reasons why people are interested to keep SeaMonkey alive. I know mine (BenBucksch) are very different from those of some users.
This has major influence on the way we're taking and the change we'll make to SeaMonkey in the future, in all areas: UI, merging with Gecko, infrastructure.
Developers
biesi
Stefan Borggraefe
Ben Bucksch
Reasons to keep SeaMonkey
Developed 2 browsers based on it and need to keep them thriving
Problems with Firefox
- Extreme instability code-wise (impossible to base derivates on it)
- 'We're not accepting patches' shows general attitude of some developers
Desired changes to SeaMonkey
- Leaner UI (at least removing redundant UI)
- make browser and mail client different processes