Accessibility/qa: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
* [http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2006/12/xul-explorer-02/ XUL Explorer]
* [http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2006/12/xul-explorer-02/ XUL Explorer]
|-  
|-  
| [http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/atk/ ATK]/[http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/at-spi/ AT-SPI]
| [http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/atk/ ATK] & [http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/at-spi/ AT-SPI]
|
|
* [http://people.redhat.com/zcerza/dogtail/ Dogtail]
* [http://people.redhat.com/zcerza/dogtail/ Dogtail]

Revision as of 22:28, 20 February 2007

The Mozilla accessibility testing strategy is still under development.

Here are some thoughts on what kind of testing we need:

Testing need Possible tools as a starting point Possible integration points for automated test tools Possible integration into interactive dev tools
XUL
  • Tinderbox/buildbots
  • addons.mozilla.org auto review process
ATK & AT-SPI Tinderbox/buildbots None (use AT-Poke/Pypoke as standalone)
IAccessible2 Tinderbox/buildbots None (use any of the above as standalone)
ARIA Unknown Unknown Firebug, Composer