Talk:Websites/Mozilla.org/Archive/Planning: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(OpenOffice contribute page as good example)
 
(add section on Downloads)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Contribute page example ==
OpenOffice has a good contribute page: [http://contributing.openoffice.org/index.html http://contributing.openoffice.org/index.html]
OpenOffice has a good contribute page: [http://contributing.openoffice.org/index.html http://contributing.openoffice.org/index.html]
== Tired Mozilla Downloads page ==
http://www.mozilla.org/products/ prominently says "Looking for other Mozilla software?" that takes you to http://www.mozilla.org/download.html.  But:
* Its left-hand badge lists "Mozilla" (1.x) as one of only three products.
* It points directly to FTP downloads for some projects but for others links to an information page.
I guess some of these are significant download pages and the info about Mac OS 9 might be of interest, but I think it would be better to merge this information with the projects page, have Products link to that, and kill download.html. -- [[User:Skierpage|Skierpage]] 17:56, 8 May 2008 (PDT)

Revision as of 00:56, 9 May 2008

Contribute page example

OpenOffice has a good contribute page: http://contributing.openoffice.org/index.html

Tired Mozilla Downloads page

http://www.mozilla.org/products/ prominently says "Looking for other Mozilla software?" that takes you to http://www.mozilla.org/download.html. But:

  • Its left-hand badge lists "Mozilla" (1.x) as one of only three products.
  • It points directly to FTP downloads for some projects but for others links to an information page.

I guess some of these are significant download pages and the info about Mac OS 9 might be of interest, but I think it would be better to merge this information with the projects page, have Products link to that, and kill download.html. -- Skierpage 17:56, 8 May 2008 (PDT)