QA/Photon Structure: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
< QA
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
= Overview =
'''Approvals Required / Received'''
== Purpose ==
Quality assurance plan to ensure accessibility features with e10s enabled using Windows and Linux operating system are ready for public release.


Note: Despite this wiki page title, this test plan is for accessibility + e10s in general, not just touchscreen support.
The following individuals are required to/have approved this Test Plan:


== Quality Criteria ==
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width:95%"
|-
|-
! Risk area !! Requirement !! Status
! Name !! Title !! Department !! Approval Date !! Method
|-
|-
| Screen readers || There should be no significant difference in using screen readers than on non-e10s|| style="background-color:#CEF2F2;" | [https://wiki.mozilla.org/QA/e10s_A11y_Windows_touchscreen#Screen_Readers In-Progress]
| || QA Manager || Product Integrity || Date || Email
|-
|-
| Touch screens || Touch enabled devices, including soft keyboards, should function as well as in non-e10s (confirm a11y isn't activated for touch screen users)|| style="background-color:#CEF2F2;" | [https://wiki.mozilla.org/QA/e10s_A11y_Windows_touchscreen#Touch_Screens In-Progress]
| || Software Engineer || Engineering || Date || Email
|-
|-
| IME clients || Common IME clients should function as well as in non-e10s|| style="background-color:#CEF2F2;" | [https://wiki.mozilla.org/QA/e10s_A11y_Windows_touchscreen#IME_Clients TBD]
| || EPM || Product Management || Date || Email
|}
 
 
'''Revision History'''
 
This section describes the modifications that have been made to this wiki page. A new row has been completed each time the content of this document is updated (small corrections for typographical errors do not need to be recorded).  The description of the modification contains the differences from the prior version, in terms of what sections were updated and to what extent.
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width:60%"
|-
! Date !! Version !! Author !! Description
|-
| 11/23/2015 || 1.0 || Brindusa Tot || Created first draft
|-
|-
| Remote Desktop clients || Browser stability issues while access the browser through RDP || style="background-color:#CEF2F2;" | In-Progress
| 10/05/2016|| 1.1 || Adrian Florinescu ||  Added point : 3.2 Channel dependent settings (configs) and environment setup
|-
|-
| Popular sites (ie, gmail, twitter, facebook, and the other Google apps || No significant regression in site correctness, stability or performance with e10s and a11y compared to a11y on non-e10s|| style="background-color:#CEF2F2;" | [https://wiki.mozilla.org/QA/e10s_A11y_Windows_touchscreen#Popular_Sites In-Progress]
| 02/28/2017|| 1.2 || Brindusa Tot || Move Risk Assessment and Coverage upper in the test plan, under the Test Strategy chapter
|-
|-
| ARIA markup || There should be no significant difference in a11y exposed interfaces for e10s vs non-e10s|| style="background-color:#CEF2F2;" | [https://wiki.mozilla.org/QA/e10s_A11y_Windows_touchscreen#ARIA_Markup In-Progress]
| 05/09/2017|| 1.3 || Brindusa Tot ||  Update content based on new train model (without Aurora)
|-
|-
| General performance || Overall performance of Firefox with a11y on e10s should not be notably worse than with a11y on non-e10s|| style="background-color:#CEF2F2;" | [https://wiki.mozilla.org/QA/e10s_A11y_Windows_touchscreen#General_Performance In-Progress]
| 06/08/2017|| 1.4 || Rares Bologa ||  Added 'Approvals' area
|}
|}


= Testing summary =
= Overview =
== Purpose ==
Detail the purpose of this document. For example:
* The test scope, focus areas and objectives
* The test responsibilities
* The test strategy for the levels and types of test for this release
* The entry and exit criteria
* The basis of the test estimates
* Any risks, issues, assumptions and test dependencies
* The test schedule and major milestones
* The test deliverables
 
== Scope ==
This wiki details the testing that will be performed by the project team for the <project name> project. It defines the overall testing requirements and provides an integrated view of the project test activities. Its purpose is to document:
* What will be tested
* How testing will be performed
 
== Ownership ==
What resources are needed, and when (developers, QA, PMs working on the feature)
= Testing summary =  
== Scope of Testing ==
== Scope of Testing ==
=== In Scope ===
=== In Scope ===
The scope of our testing is the A11y+e10s accessibility and functionality and performance of the most popular sites and most commonly used 3rd party tools.
Detail what is in scope from a testing perspective for the project team.
 
* Integration: Verify the integration with the current browser functionalities and UI;
* Functionality: Basic and advanced functionality to be verified according to the existing requirements;
* Usability: Intuitive and how users interact with the feature;
* Performance:  Reference, where applicable, observed and collected performance data.


=== Out of Scope ===
=== Out of Scope ===
We will not be testing with less popular 3rd party tools or on obscure web sites.
Detail what is out of scope from a testing perspective for the project team. Note: if usability testing is not in the scope of testing feature.


= Requirements for testing =
= Requirements for testing =
== Environments ==
== Environments ==
Testing will be performed on following OSes:
Specify OSes that need to be covered
Specify Devices that need to be covered
Specify other configuration/environmental setup needed


* Windows 10 (x64)
* Linux - Ubuntu 16.04 (x64)


= Quality Assurance Strategy =
== Channel dependent settings (configs) and environment setups ==
== Test Items ==
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:auto">
=== Screen Readers ===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width:85%"
=== Nightly ===
|-
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
! Client !! Free/Licensed !! Demo Available? !! Demo Expiration || Purchased Copy? || Owner/Location
text
</div>
 
=== Beta ===
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
text
</div>
 
=== Post Beta / Release ===
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
text
</div>
</div>
 
= Test Strategy =
== Risk Assessment and Coverage ==
 
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
| NVDA (Win) (top priority) || free || TBD
! ID !! Description / Threat Description !! Covered by Test Objective !!  Magnitude !! Probability !! Priority !! Impact Score
|-
|-
| Window-Eyes (Win) || licensed || [http://www.gwmicro.com/Window-Eyes/Demo/ link][1] || 60 days || TBD || TBD
| RAC-1 || Risk description 1 || TO-1 || 2-Moderate || 1-Unlikely || 3-High || 6
|-
|-
| JAWS (Win) || licensed || - || TBD || Yes (Windows) || Softvision USA/Las Vegas
| RAC-2 || Risk description 2 || TO-1 || 3-High || 3-Almost Certain || 3-High || 27
|-
|-
| Dolphin (Win) || licensed || TBD || TBD || TBD || TBD
| RAC-3 || Risk description 3 || TO-2 || 2-Moderate || 2-Possible || 3-High || 12
|}
|}
[1] requires filling in a contact information form


{| class="wikitable" style="width:95%"
'''Values:'''
|-
 
! Criteria Description
* '''Magnitude:''' 1- Low , ''2-Moderate'', '''3-High'''
! Metric
! non-e10s value
! e10s value
! Criteria Met?
! QA Owner
|-
| Manual testing
| Test cases passed
| # (passed -TBD) out of # (total test cases run -TBD)
| # (passed -TBD) out of # (total test cases run -TBD)
| style="background-color:#CEF2F2;" | TBD (Date status updated)
| style="background-color:#CEF2F2;" | SoftVision
|}


=== Touch Screens ===
* '''Probability:''' 1-Unlikely, ''2-Possible'', '''3-Almost Certain'''
Because a11y should no longer be triggered by touch screen devices, only the first metric below should block release of a11y+e10s.


{| class="wikitable" style="width:95%"
* '''Priority:''' 1 - Low, ''2-Medium'', '''3-High'''
|-
! Criteria Description
! Metric
! non-e10s value
! e10s value
! Criteria Met?
! QA Owner
|-
| Manual testing
| A11y enabled? (should be false)
| true or false
| true or false
| style="background-color:#CEF2F2;" | TBD (Date status updated)
| style="background-color:#CEF2F2;" | SoftVision 
|-
| Manual testing
| [https://testrail.stage.mozaws.net/index.php?/suites/view/376&group_by=cases:section_id&group_order=asc TestRail Test cases passed] or [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jYMwJN0vm3S0ArCD8B9gLajHYBVuuX3PIjdyJUOhftY/edit#gid=0 Google Docs]
| # (passed -TBD) out of 26 test cases run
| # (passed -TBD) out of 26 test cases run
| style="background-color:#CEF2F2;" | TBD (Date status updated)
| style="background-color:#CEF2F2;" | SoftVision 
|}


=== IME Clients ===
'''Impact Score Breakdown:'''
These are very difficult to test if one is not familiar with the language under test. Until we have a better longer term test ownership solution, we'll have to rely on community feedback and bug reports.
* An impact value of 1, 2, 3, 4 would describe an area which although should be covered there aren't expected any discoveries of critical issues.
* An impact value of 6, 8, 9, 12 would describe an area in which we expect to find issues but those issues are not expected to be critical.
* An impact value of 18 or 27 would describe an area on which it is likely to find issues and those issues to be critical or blockers.


{| class="wikitable" style="width:85%"
== Test Objectives ==
|-
This section details the progression test objectives that will be covered. Please note that this is at a high level. For large projects, a suite of test cases would be created which would reference directly back to this master.
! Language !! Primary IME !! 3rd party
This could be documented in bullet form or in a table similar to the one below.
|-
| Japanese || Win: MS-IME, macOS: Apple Japanese IME || Google Japanese Input, ATOK (not free)
|-
| Simplified Chinese || Pinyin || ABC
|-
| Traditional Chinese || Changjie
|-
| Korean || Win: MS-IME, macOS: Apple Korean IME
|}


{| class="wikitable" style="width:95%"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
! Criteria Description
! Ref !! Function !! Test Objective !! Evaluation Criteria !! Test Type !! RAC !! Owners
! Metric
! non-e10s value
! e10s value
! Criteria Met?
! QA Owner
|-
|-
| Manual testing
| 1 || Name of the feature or sub-function being tested || The objective the test is trying to demonstrate || The criteria that will be evaluated to demonstrate the test is successful || Manual/ Automation/ Regression/ Performance/ Usability/ Security/ Telemetry || RAC-1, RAC-2, RAC-3 || Eng Team
| Community input and bug reports
| # of bug reports
| # of bug reports
| style="background-color:#CEF2F2;" | TBD (Date status updated)
| style="background-color:#CEF2F2;" | Community
|}
 
=== Popular Sites ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:95%"
|-
|-
! Criteria Description
| 2 || Repeat for each feature/sub-function || || || || ||
! Metric
! non-e10s value
! e10s value
! Criteria Met?
! QA Owner
|-
|-
| Manual testing
| 3 || || || || || ||
| Test cases passed
| # (passed -TBD) out of # (total test cases run -TBD)
| # (passed -TBD) out of # (total test cases run -TBD)
| style="background-color:#CEF2F2;" | TBD (Date status updated)
| style="background-color:#CEF2F2;" | SoftVision
|}
|}


== Builds ==
== Builds ==
 
This section should contain links for builds with the feature -
TBD
* Links for Nightly builds
* Links for Beta builds


== Test Execution Schedule ==
== Test Execution Schedule ==
Line 169: Line 141:
! Project phase !! Start Date !! End Date
! Project phase !! Start Date !! End Date
|-
|-
| Start project
| Start project  
|style="text-align:center;" | December 2016
|style="text-align:center;" | ||  
|style="text-align:center;" | -
|-
|-
| Study documentation/specs received from developers
| Study documentation/specs received from developers
|style="text-align:center;" | TBD
|style="text-align:center;" | ||  
|style="text-align:center;" | -
|-
|-
| QA - Test plan creation
| QA - Test plan creation  
|style="text-align:center;" | 12/13/2016
|style="text-align:center;" | ||  
|style="text-align:center;" | -
|-
|-
| QA - Test cases/Env preparation
| QA - Test cases/Env preparation  
|style="text-align:center;" | 12/12/2016
|style="text-align:center;" | ||  
|style="text-align:center;" | -
|-
|-
| QA - Nightly Testing
| QA - Nightly Testing  
|style="text-align:center;" | February/March 2017
|style="text-align:center;" | ||  
|style="text-align:center;" | -
|-
|-
| QA - Aurora Testing
| QA - Beta Testing  
|style="text-align:center;" |  Unknown
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||  
|style="text-align:center;" | 
|-
| QA - Beta Testing
|style="text-align:center;" |  Unknown
|style="text-align:center;" |
|-
|-
| Release Date
| Release Date  
|style="text-align:center;" | Unknown
|style="text-align:center;" | ||  
|style="text-align:center;" |
|}
|}


Line 210: Line 171:
| Test plan creation || Mozilla wiki
| Test plan creation || Mozilla wiki
|-
|-
| Test case creation || TestRail
| Test case creation || [https://testrail.stage.mozaws.net/index.php TestRail]/ Google docs
|-
|-
| Test case execution || TestRail
| Test case execution || [https://testrail.stage.mozaws.net/index.php TestRail]
|-
|-
| Bugs management || Bugzilla/GitHub (mainly)
| Bugs management || Bugzilla
|}
|}


= Status =
= Status =  
== Overview ==
== Overview ==
* Track the dates and build number where feature was released to Nightly<br />
Track the dates and build number where feature was released to Nightly
* Track the dates and build number where feature was merged to Aurora<br />
Track the dates and build number where feature was merged to Release/Beta
* Track the dates and build number where feature was merged to Release/Beta<br />
 


= References =
= References =
N/A
* List and links for specs
  List and links for available specs - documents, user stories, specifications
* Meta bug
= Testcases =
== Test Areas ==
{| class="wikitable" style="width:80%"
|-
! Test Areas !! Covered !! Details
|-
| Private Window
|style="text-align:center;" | ||
|-
| Multi-Process Enabled
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
| Multi-process Disabled
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
| Theme (high contrast)
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
| '''UI'''
||  ||
|-
| Mouse-only operation 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
| Keyboard-only operation 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
| Display (HiDPI)
|style="text-align:center;" | ||
|-
| Interaction (scroll, zoom)
|style="text-align:center;" | ||
|-
| Usable with a screen reader 
|style="text-align:center;" |  || e.g. with NVDA
|-
| Usability and/or discoverability testing 
|style="text-align:center;" |  || Is this feature user friendly
|-
| RTL build testing 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
| '''Help/Support'''
||  ||
|-
| Help/support interface required 
|style="text-align:center;" |  || Make sure link to support/help page exist and is easy reachable.
|-
| Support documents planned(written) 
|style="text-align:center;" |  || Make sure support documents are written and are correct.


= Testcases =
|-
N/A
| '''Install/Upgrade'''
||  ||
|-
| Feature upgrades/downgrades data as expected 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
| Does sync work across upgrades 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
| Requires install testing   
|style="text-align:center;" |  || separate feature/application installation needed (not only Firefox)
|-
| Affects first-run or onboarding   
|style="text-align:center;" |  || Florin/Lawrence are investigating if there is a dedicated QA for this, or we should test? Should be an yes/no and if is yes should add in detail column the team/person assigned.
|-
| Does this affect partner builds? Partner build testing 
|style="text-align:center;" |  || yes/no options, add comment with details about who will lead testing
 
|-
| ''' Enterprise '''
||  ||  Raise up the topic to developers to see if they are expecting to work different on ESR builds
|-
| Enterprise administration 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
| Network proxies/autoconfig 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
| ESR behavior changes 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
| Locked preferences 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
 
|-
| ''' Data Monitoring '''
||  ||
|-
| Temporary or permanent telemetry monitoring 
|style="text-align:center;" |  || List of error conditions to monitor
|-
| Telemetry correctness testing 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
| Server integration testing 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
| Offline and server failure testing 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
| Load testing 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
 
|-
| ''' Add-ons '''
||  || If add-ons are available for testing feature, or is current feature will affect some add-ons, then API testing should be done for the add-on.
|-
| Addon API required? 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
| Comprehensive API testing 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
| Permissions 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
| Testing with existing/popular addons
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
 
|-
| ''' Security '''
||  || Security is in charge of Matt Wobensmith. We should contact his team to see if security testing is necessary for current feature.
|-
| 3rd-party security review 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
| Privilege escalation testing
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
| Fuzzing 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
 
|-
| ''' Web Compatibility '''
||  || depends on the feature
|-
| Testing against target sites 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
| Survey of many sites for compatibility 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
 
|-
| ''' Interoperability  '''
||  || depends on the feature
|-
| Common protocol/data format with other software: specification available. Interop testing with other common clients or servers. 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
| Coordinated testing/interop across the Firefoxes: Desktop, Android, iOS 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
| Interaction of this feature with other browser features 
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|}
 
== Test suite ==
Full Test suite - Link to test rail - testcases should be added under Firefox Desktop project [https://testrail.stage.mozaws.net/index.php?/suites/overview/17 link]
Smoke Test suite - Link with the tests - if available/needed.
Regression Test suite - Link with the tests - if available/needed.


= Bug Work =
= Bug Work =
Meta bug: [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12345 12345 - bug summary]


*Bugzilla Meta Bugs
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:auto">
====== Logged bugs ( blocking [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12345 12345] )======


*  {{Bug|1349210}} - [Meta] Photon Structure
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
<bugzilla>
<bugzilla>
     {
     {
         "blocks":[1349210],
         "blocks":[12345],
         "include_fields": "id, priority, component, assigned_to, summary, status, target_milestone"
         "include_fields": "id, priority, component, assigned_to, summary, status, target_milestone"
     }
     }
</bugzilla>
</bugzilla>


</div>
</div>


<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:auto">
====== Bug fix verification ======
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
<bugzilla>
    {
        "blocks":[12345],
        "resolution":"FIXED",
        "include_fields": "id, priority, component, assigned_to, summary, status, resolution, target_milestone"
    }
</bugzilla>
</div>
</div>


= Sign off =
= Sign off =
== Criteria ==
== Criteria ==
Check list
Checklist
* All Criteria under each section of Quality Assurance Strategy should be green.
* All test cases should be executed
* All test cases should be executed
* Has sufficient automated test coverage (as measured by code coverage tools) - coordinate with RelMan
* All blockers, criticals must be fixed and verified or have an agreed-upon timeline for being fixed (as determined by engineering/RelMan/QA)
* All blockers, criticals must be fixed and verified or have an agreed-upon timeline for being fixed (as determined by engineering/RelMan/QA)


== Results ==
== Results ==
'''Aurora testing'''<br />
'''Nightly testing'''<br />
* TBD on TestRail


'''Merge to Aurora Sign-off'''<br />
List of OSes that will be covered by testing<br />
List of OSes that will be covered by testing<br />
*Link for the tests run - Not applicable
*Link for the tests run
** Full Test suite - Not applicable
** Full Test suite, link to TestRail - Tests Runs and Results [https://testrail.stage.mozaws.net/index.php?/runs/overview/17 link]
** Daily Smoke, if needed/available
** Regression Test suite, if needed/available
<br />
 
'''Merge to Beta Sign-off'''<br />
List of OSes that will be covered by testing<br />
*Link for the tests run
** Full Test suite


== Checklist ==
== Checklist ==
Line 264: Line 409:
! Exit Criteria !! Status !! Notes/Details
! Exit Criteria !! Status !! Notes/Details
|-
|-
Verification of Features || {{mprog}} || Email to be sent
Testing Prerequisites (specs, use cases)
|}
| style="text-align:center;" | 
 
| style="text-align:center;" |
== Ownership ==
|-
Product contact:<br />
Testing Infrastructure setup
N/A
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||  
 
|-
User Experience contact:<br />
|  Test Plan Creation
N/A
| style="text-align:center;" |  ||
 
|-
Engineering contact:<br />
|  Test Cases Creation
[mailto:gkruitbosch@mozilla.com Gijs Kruitbosch] (IRC: gijs) <br />
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
[mailto:mmucci@mozilla.com Marco Mucci] (IRC: ) <br />
|-
 
|  Automation Coverage ||
 
|style="text-align:center;" |
QA:<br />
|-
PM for QA team - [mailto:rares.bologa@softvisioninc.eu Rares Bologa] (IRC: RaresB)<br />
|  Performance Testing
QA Lead - [mailto:gwimberly@softvision.com Grover Wimberly IV] (IRC: Grover-QA)<br />
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
QA - [mailto:kkumari@softvision.com Kanchan Kumari] (IRC: Kanchan_QA)<br />
|-
QA - [mailto:jwilliams@softvision.com Justin Williams] (IRC: JW_SoftvisionQA)<br />
|  All Defects Logged || ||
QA - [mailto:stefan.georgiev@softvision.com Stefan Georgiev] (IRC: StefanG_QA)<br />
|-
QA - [mailto:amasresha@softvision.com Abe Masresha] (IRC: Abe_LV)<br />
|  Critical/Blockers Fixed and Verified || ||
 
|-
'''Revision History'''
|  Metrics/Telemetry||
 
|style="text-align:center;" |
This section describes the modifications that have been made to this wiki page. A new row has been completed each time the content of this document is updated (small corrections for typographical errors do not need to be recorded). The description of the modification contains the differences from the prior version, in terms of what sections were updated and to what extent.
|-
 
|  Basic/Core functionality Nightly testing
{| class="wikitable" style="width:60%"
|style="text-align:center;" | 
|style="text-align:center;" | 
|-
QA mid-Nightly Signoff||
|style="text-align:center;" | Email to be sent
|-
| QA Nightly - Full Testing
|style="text-align:center;" |  ||
|-
|-
! Date !! Version !! Author !! Description
|  QA pre-Beta Signoff||
|style="text-align:center;"| Email to be sent
|-
|-
| 5/3/2017 || 1.0 || Grover Wimberly IV || Created first draft
| QA Beta - Full Testing
|style="text-align:center;" | ||  
|-
|-
|  QA pre-Release Signoff ||
|style="text-align:center;" | Email to be sent
|}
|}

Revision as of 16:34, 28 June 2017

Approvals Required / Received

The following individuals are required to/have approved this Test Plan:

Name Title Department Approval Date Method
QA Manager Product Integrity Date Email
Software Engineer Engineering Date Email
EPM Product Management Date Email


Revision History

This section describes the modifications that have been made to this wiki page. A new row has been completed each time the content of this document is updated (small corrections for typographical errors do not need to be recorded). The description of the modification contains the differences from the prior version, in terms of what sections were updated and to what extent.

Date Version Author Description
11/23/2015 1.0 Brindusa Tot Created first draft
10/05/2016 1.1 Adrian Florinescu Added point : 3.2 Channel dependent settings (configs) and environment setup
02/28/2017 1.2 Brindusa Tot Move Risk Assessment and Coverage upper in the test plan, under the Test Strategy chapter
05/09/2017 1.3 Brindusa Tot Update content based on new train model (without Aurora)
06/08/2017 1.4 Rares Bologa Added 'Approvals' area

Overview

Purpose

Detail the purpose of this document. For example:

  • The test scope, focus areas and objectives
  • The test responsibilities
  • The test strategy for the levels and types of test for this release
  • The entry and exit criteria
  • The basis of the test estimates
  • Any risks, issues, assumptions and test dependencies
  • The test schedule and major milestones
  • The test deliverables

Scope

This wiki details the testing that will be performed by the project team for the <project name> project. It defines the overall testing requirements and provides an integrated view of the project test activities. Its purpose is to document:

  • What will be tested
  • How testing will be performed

Ownership

What resources are needed, and when (developers, QA, PMs working on the feature)

Testing summary

Scope of Testing

In Scope

Detail what is in scope from a testing perspective for the project team.

Out of Scope

Detail what is out of scope from a testing perspective for the project team. Note: if usability testing is not in the scope of testing feature.

Requirements for testing

Environments

Specify OSes that need to be covered
Specify Devices that need to be covered
Specify other configuration/environmental setup needed


Channel dependent settings (configs) and environment setups

Nightly

text

Beta

text

Post Beta / Release

text

Test Strategy

Risk Assessment and Coverage

ID Description / Threat Description Covered by Test Objective Magnitude Probability Priority Impact Score
RAC-1 Risk description 1 TO-1 2-Moderate 1-Unlikely 3-High 6
RAC-2 Risk description 2 TO-1 3-High 3-Almost Certain 3-High 27
RAC-3 Risk description 3 TO-2 2-Moderate 2-Possible 3-High 12

Values:

  • Magnitude: 1- Low , 2-Moderate, 3-High
  • Probability: 1-Unlikely, 2-Possible, 3-Almost Certain
  • Priority: 1 - Low, 2-Medium, 3-High

Impact Score Breakdown:

  • An impact value of 1, 2, 3, 4 would describe an area which although should be covered there aren't expected any discoveries of critical issues.
  • An impact value of 6, 8, 9, 12 would describe an area in which we expect to find issues but those issues are not expected to be critical.
  • An impact value of 18 or 27 would describe an area on which it is likely to find issues and those issues to be critical or blockers.

Test Objectives

This section details the progression test objectives that will be covered. Please note that this is at a high level. For large projects, a suite of test cases would be created which would reference directly back to this master. This could be documented in bullet form or in a table similar to the one below.

Ref Function Test Objective Evaluation Criteria Test Type RAC Owners
1 Name of the feature or sub-function being tested The objective the test is trying to demonstrate The criteria that will be evaluated to demonstrate the test is successful Manual/ Automation/ Regression/ Performance/ Usability/ Security/ Telemetry RAC-1, RAC-2, RAC-3 Eng Team
2 Repeat for each feature/sub-function
3

Builds

This section should contain links for builds with the feature -

  • Links for Nightly builds
  • Links for Beta builds

Test Execution Schedule

The following table identifies the anticipated testing period available for test execution.

Project phase Start Date End Date
Start project
Study documentation/specs received from developers
QA - Test plan creation
QA - Test cases/Env preparation
QA - Nightly Testing
QA - Beta Testing
Release Date

Testing Tools

Detail the tools to be used for testing, for example see the following table:

Process Tool
Test plan creation Mozilla wiki
Test case creation TestRail/ Google docs
Test case execution TestRail
Bugs management Bugzilla

Status

Overview

Track the dates and build number where feature was released to Nightly
Track the dates and build number where feature was merged to Release/Beta


References

  • List and links for specs
 List and links for available specs - documents, user stories, specifications
  • Meta bug

Testcases

Test Areas

Test Areas Covered Details
Private Window
Multi-Process Enabled
Multi-process Disabled
Theme (high contrast)
UI
Mouse-only operation
Keyboard-only operation
Display (HiDPI)
Interaction (scroll, zoom)
Usable with a screen reader e.g. with NVDA
Usability and/or discoverability testing Is this feature user friendly
RTL build testing
Help/Support
Help/support interface required Make sure link to support/help page exist and is easy reachable.
Support documents planned(written) Make sure support documents are written and are correct.
Install/Upgrade
Feature upgrades/downgrades data as expected
Does sync work across upgrades
Requires install testing separate feature/application installation needed (not only Firefox)
Affects first-run or onboarding Florin/Lawrence are investigating if there is a dedicated QA for this, or we should test? Should be an yes/no and if is yes should add in detail column the team/person assigned.
Does this affect partner builds? Partner build testing yes/no options, add comment with details about who will lead testing
Enterprise Raise up the topic to developers to see if they are expecting to work different on ESR builds
Enterprise administration
Network proxies/autoconfig
ESR behavior changes
Locked preferences
Data Monitoring
Temporary or permanent telemetry monitoring List of error conditions to monitor
Telemetry correctness testing
Server integration testing
Offline and server failure testing
Load testing
Add-ons If add-ons are available for testing feature, or is current feature will affect some add-ons, then API testing should be done for the add-on.
Addon API required?
Comprehensive API testing
Permissions
Testing with existing/popular addons
Security Security is in charge of Matt Wobensmith. We should contact his team to see if security testing is necessary for current feature.
3rd-party security review
Privilege escalation testing
Fuzzing
Web Compatibility depends on the feature
Testing against target sites
Survey of many sites for compatibility
Interoperability depends on the feature
Common protocol/data format with other software: specification available. Interop testing with other common clients or servers.
Coordinated testing/interop across the Firefoxes: Desktop, Android, iOS
Interaction of this feature with other browser features

Test suite

Full Test suite - Link to test rail - testcases should be added under Firefox Desktop project link
Smoke Test suite - Link with the tests - if available/needed.
Regression Test suite - Link with the tests - if available/needed.

Bug Work

Meta bug: 12345 - bug summary

Logged bugs ( blocking 12345 )
Full Query
ID Priority Component Assigned to Summary Status Target milestone
15069 P3 Networking jefft File type url not correctly parsed and created VERIFIED M13

1 Total; 0 Open (0%); 0 Resolved (0%); 1 Verified (100%);


Bug fix verification
Full Query
ID Priority Component Assigned to Summary Status Resolution Target milestone
15069 P3 Networking jefft File type url not correctly parsed and created VERIFIED FIXED M13

1 Total; 0 Open (0%); 0 Resolved (0%); 1 Verified (100%);

Sign off

Criteria

Checklist

  • All test cases should be executed
  • Has sufficient automated test coverage (as measured by code coverage tools) - coordinate with RelMan
  • All blockers, criticals must be fixed and verified or have an agreed-upon timeline for being fixed (as determined by engineering/RelMan/QA)

Results

Nightly testing

List of OSes that will be covered by testing

  • Link for the tests run
    • Full Test suite, link to TestRail - Tests Runs and Results link
    • Daily Smoke, if needed/available
    • Regression Test suite, if needed/available


Merge to Beta Sign-off
List of OSes that will be covered by testing

  • Link for the tests run
    • Full Test suite

Checklist

Exit Criteria Status Notes/Details
Testing Prerequisites (specs, use cases)
Testing Infrastructure setup
Test Plan Creation
Test Cases Creation
Automation Coverage
Performance Testing
All Defects Logged
Critical/Blockers Fixed and Verified
Metrics/Telemetry
Basic/Core functionality Nightly testing
QA mid-Nightly Signoff Email to be sent
QA Nightly - Full Testing
QA pre-Beta Signoff Email to be sent
QA Beta - Full Testing
QA pre-Release Signoff Email to be sent