Talk:Performance/Status Meetings/2007-June-27: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
FWIW, I'm not sure if Tp2 does the calculations properly. I swear I did a recent run where for one of them I had numbers like 100, 120, 110, 1600, 100 and it gave me a median of 800 for that test. Needless to say, that skewed things a bit. It did show the 1600 as grayed out, but it seems it was still factored into the calculation. | FWIW, I'm not sure if Tp2 does the calculations properly. I swear I did a recent run where for one of them I had numbers like 100, 120, 110, 1600, 100 and it gave me a median of 800 for that test. Needless to say, that skewed things a bit. It did show the 1600 as grayed out, but it seems it was still factored into the calculation. | ||
EDIT: OK, I know for sure it's not calculating correctly. Here's five times from a run I just did: | |||
391 296 390 234 297 | |||
As intended, it did grey out the 391 value. However, it still calculated a median of 343.50, which is clearly wrong. It should be 296.50. It appears that instead of averaging the middle two remaining numbers, it's averaging the top two remaining numbers. | |||
Revision as of 13:36, 27 June 2007
FWIW, I'm not sure if Tp2 does the calculations properly. I swear I did a recent run where for one of them I had numbers like 100, 120, 110, 1600, 100 and it gave me a median of 800 for that test. Needless to say, that skewed things a bit. It did show the 1600 as grayed out, but it seems it was still factored into the calculation.
EDIT: OK, I know for sure it's not calculating correctly. Here's five times from a run I just did: 391 296 390 234 297
As intended, it did grey out the 391 value. However, it still calculated a median of 343.50, which is clearly wrong. It should be 296.50. It appears that instead of averaging the middle two remaining numbers, it's averaging the top two remaining numbers.