Taskcluster/Meetings/2014-01-23: Difference between revisions
< Taskcluster | Meetings
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
=== Job Queue (owner: dminor/ted) === | === Job Queue (owner: dminor/ted) === | ||
* Created postgres based branch | |||
** sqlite was slow even for testing! | |||
** task queue in postgres doesn't work very well and was replaced in socorro with rabbitmq | |||
* Created postgres/rabbitmq branch | |||
** Moved job queue to rabbit, tests are working well with minimal changes | |||
** Set up docker packaging to handle postgres, rabbit dependencies | |||
** Pull requests coming soon | |||
=== Provisioner (owner: jonas) === | === Provisioner (owner: jonas) === | ||
Revision as of 16:21, 23 January 2014
Previous Action Items
- [dustin] to discuss deployment strategies (heroku vs internal?) with lightsofapollo and other module owners
- [jgriffin] to find a different meeting time for next week
- Done, let me know if Thursdays @ 11am is bad for someone.
Status Updates
Job Queue (owner: dminor/ted)
- Created postgres based branch
- sqlite was slow even for testing!
- task queue in postgres doesn't work very well and was replaced in socorro with rabbitmq
- Created postgres/rabbitmq branch
- Moved job queue to rabbit, tests are working well with minimal changes
- Set up docker packaging to handle postgres, rabbit dependencies
- Pull requests coming soon
Provisioner (owner: jonas)
Worker (owner: lightsofapollo, jonas, ted)
- live logging done (as of last week) - wiring up existing docker running capabilities to amqp/http interfaces (with live logging either on or off) in progress - Aim to have complete (AMI) deploy-able image by next meeting.
Task Graph (owner: aki)
Treeherder Integration (owner: jeads)
End-to-End Testing (ted)
- initial dev box is ready https://github.com/taskcluster/packer-boxes (and available on s3) usable for docker "service" based testing. - need final agreement on docker-ifying the rest of the services and plan for the "deployment" repo
Round Table
- testing of services? (just looking for formal agreement on docker all top level services) - documentation site