Releases/Fennec1.0maemo/Post Mortem: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Nick doesn't want any content until we discuss at the meeting.)
Line 1: Line 1:
= Agenda =
= Agenda =
== What went not so well? ==
== What went not so well? ==
* Finding regression windows
** Example - between beta 5 and the tip in Dec, a regression occurred that drastically diminished page load performance.  Tracking down this change basically halted development.
* Supporting fast plugin drawing
** The work to get flash drawing fast seemed rushed and last minute.
* Release Engineering lead times are very long
** Example - nightly linux mobile builds took about a year (bug 469290), try server took about 6 months (bug 465039).


== What went well? ==
== What went well? ==
* Work on performance between pre-RC1 and Final went very well.
* Interactions between the front end team and the back end team worked very well.
* Asking for small mozconfig changes from releng happened the same day.


== How will we change in the future? (themes for improvement) ==
== How will we change in the future? (themes for improvement) ==

Revision as of 07:47, 11 February 2010

Agenda

What went not so well?

What went well?

How will we change in the future? (themes for improvement)