Release Management/Uplift rules: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(more info)
(security uplift with a deadline)
Line 32: Line 32:
=Security fixes=
=Security fixes=
As described in [[Security/Bug_Approval_Process]]
As described in [[Security/Bug_Approval_Process]]
 
If the bug whiteboard contains a deadline, the uplift should be granted only after this date.


[[category:Release_Management|U]]
[[category:Release_Management|U]]

Revision as of 10:19, 19 February 2014

This document is a draft.

This page describes the rules applied by the Release Team to uplift a patch in one of the release.

All regular guidelines for changes apply.

Aurora Uplift (approval-mozilla-aurora)

  • Can accept IDL (with UUID bump) changes as we do not lock down binary for addons until Beta
  • No string changes unless late-l10n awareness and OK given
  • Must be landed on mozilla-central, or reason given for direct-to-branch uplift
  • No new feature landing
  • No disruptive important refactoring
  • No massive code changes

Beta Uplift (approval-mozilla-beta)

  • Must be landed on mozilla-central as well as mozilla-aurora, or reason given for direct-to-branch uplift
  • Ideally reproducible by QA so easily verified
  • Has 'baked' on m-c/aurora and demonstrated decrease in crash or reproducibility
  • No string changes
  • No changes to UUID in .idl files (will break addon compatibility)

Changes can be:

  • Performance improvement (proven, need real numbers)
  • Top-crashers
  • Recent regressions

The closer to the release the more careful uplift should be done.

Release Uplift

  • Must be a part of a known-issue respin or NPTOB (not part of the build) config changes needed to support build infra

Security fixes

As described in Security/Bug_Approval_Process If the bug whiteboard contains a deadline, the uplift should be granted only after this date.