SeaMonkey:Reasons
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
I'd like to understand the reasons why people are interested to keep SeaMonkey alive. I know mine (BenBucksch) are very different from those of some users.
This has major influence on the way we're taking and the change we'll make to SeaMonkey in the future, in all areas: UI, merging with Gecko, infrastructure.
| Name | Developers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Reasons to keep SeaMonkey | Problems with Firefox (if any) | Desired changes to SeaMonkey (if any) |
| biesi | |||
| Stefan Borggraefe | |||
| Ben Bucksch | Developed 2 browsers based on it and need to keep them thriving | Arrogance of some core developers and ignorance of contributors ("We're not accepting patches" in original readme), extreme instability (impossible to base derivates on it) | Leaner UI (at least removing redundant UI), make browser and mail client different processes |
| bz | |||
| Neil Rashbrook |