E10s/Status/Jan15: Difference between revisions

E10s/Status/Jan15 (view source)

Revision as of 04:19, 20 January 2016

43 bytes removed , 20 January 2016

→‎Validation for Stability and Performance

ErinL ancaster

canmove, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti

5,401

edits

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 ==Validation for Stability and Performance==
-*'''Beta 44 A/B Telemetry Experiment''' ended on Jan 3. We found that the population included in the experiment included users with Add-Ons and people with a11y enabled. Both of which we originally intended to be omitted from the experiment.
+*'''Beta 44 A/B Telemetry Experiment''' ended on Jan 3. We found that the population included in the experiment included users with Add-Ons and people with a11y enabled. Both of which we originally intended to be omitted from the experiment. Here are some conclusions as posted to Dev-Planning: http://pastebin.com/SUT7WPkq
-** We need the BHR responsiveness measurement from the e10s content process in order to accurately compare e10s with non-e10s. {{Bug|1228437}}. Currently, we are not accurately measuring responsiveness.
+** We need the BHR responsiveness measurement from the e10s content process in order to accurately compare e10s with non-e10s. {{Bug|1228437}}.
 **We also have recently uplifted a patch to fix the fact that we're over counting crash reports for the content process {{Bug|1227312}}.
 **At this point, we are working on the design for the Beta 45 experiment and being certain to curate the aforementioned uplifts (long with with others) that fix telemetry measures before we deploy to 45.
-**You can see Vladan's latest post on Dev-Planning Newsgroup but in the meantime, there's lot's of info, below:
+**We are tracking various information, below:
 ** Telemetry E10S Measurement Meta {{Bug|1222849}}
 ** Performance Tracker Meta {{Bug|1198187}}