Electrolysis/Release Criteria/Jank: Difference between revisions

→‎Talos tp5o_responsiveness: results of yesterday's investigations.
(more details)
(→‎Talos tp5o_responsiveness: results of yesterday's investigations.)
Line 52: Line 52:
This test is hugely better in e10s. tp5o_responsiveness on WinXP mozilla-central (results not available on Aurora).
This test is hugely better in e10s. tp5o_responsiveness on WinXP mozilla-central (results not available on Aurora).


Concerns: Is this number valid? Why is it so much better in e10s? Is it from the chrome process or content?
Contact points for this test are listed in its [https://wiki.mozilla.org/Buildbot/Talos/Tests#Responsiveness|Talos Test Description]. At time of edit, these are :jimm and :jmaher.


A RESPONSIBLE PARTY NEEDS TO BE FOUND FOR THIS TEST
On consulting the relevant bug ({{bug|710296}}), :avih and :jmaher, and the test's bug ({{bug|631571}}) I learned that the test results should be expected. The test does the following: while loading the tp5 top websites, inject custom tracer events into the parent process' event loop and measure how long it takes for them to percolate through.
 
This test is a valid test of chrome responsiveness during content load. Chrome responsiveness under heavy content load is expected to improve (that being one of the reasons for E10s in the first place).
 
'''next steps''': PASS (pending :avih's validation and documentation of tp5o_responsiveness' usefulness as an e10s metric)


=== GC pauses ===
=== GC pauses ===
106

edits