TPE DOM/Storage: Difference between revisions

 
(17 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 26: Line 26:
All issues breakdown has been sign-off by dev-team.
All issues breakdown has been sign-off by dev-team.


* '''MVP completed rate: 71.4%'''
* '''MVP completed rate: 93.5% (exclude meta bug)'''
* Remaining MVP issues:
* Remaining MVP issues:
** Platform: 5 bugs
** Platform: 3 bugs
** Front-end: 6 bugs
** Front-end: 0 bugs
** UX: 1 bug
** UX: 0 bug
* Target shipping date: ride on Firefox 57 nightly, 6/12
* Target shipping date: ride on Firefox 57 nightly, 6/12
** Target all MVP completed date: Firefox 56 nightly, 4/17
** Target all MVP completed date: Firefox 2nd 55 nightly, 4/17
*** Softvision should be able to do full test (1st round) on Firefox 56 nightly
*** Softvision has started 1st round testing on nightly 56 on 6/12
*** Final verification (2nd round) should be proceed on Firefox 57 nightly
*** Final verification (2nd round) should be proceed on Firefox 57 nightly
*** Ref: [[RapidRelease/Calendar|Release calendar]]
*** Ref: [[RapidRelease/Calendar|Release calendar]]
* Next check point: 3/17
* Next check point: 6/19


In the Storage management V1.5, we have started to create telemetry related issues in order to understand even better our users' behavior. We will be definitely benefited and able to come out a more user friendly V2 plan.  
In the Storage management V1.5, we have started to create telemetry related issues in order to understand even better our users' behavior. We will be definitely benefited and able to come out a more user friendly V2 plan.  
Line 46: Line 46:


== Risk & Mitigation plan ==
== Risk & Mitigation plan ==
*Patch review takes much longer than expected. communication has been made with reviewer during Hawaii workweek and the following week. we have highlighted project schedule, priority and slow patch review eventually blocks other issues such as front-end issues.
*NA
**Result: Review process has been accelerated since B/Feb, we expect it continues.
*Softvision resource seems not applicable for storage management testing.
** Andrew has helped us to request softvision's resource.


== MDN page ==
== MDN page ==
Line 65: Line 62:
<bugzilla>
<bugzilla>
     {
     {
         "id":["1147820"]
         "id":"1147820"
     }
     }
</bugzilla>
</bugzilla>


=== Storage V1 Bugs ===
=== Storage V1 Bugs ===
[https://mzl.la/2szDnsu Triage issue list]
<bugzilla>
<bugzilla>
     {
     {
Line 77: Line 78:
         "status":["NEW","REOPENED","UNCONFIRMED","ASSIGNED","RESOLVED","VERIFIED","CLOSED"],
         "status":["NEW","REOPENED","UNCONFIRMED","ASSIGNED","RESOLVED","VERIFIED","CLOSED"],
-->
-->
         "whiteboard":["[storage-v1]"],
         "whiteboard":"[storage-v1]",
         "include_fields": "id, summary, status, target_milestone, resolution, assigned_to"
         "include_fields":[ "id", "summary", "status", "target_milestone", "resolution", "priority", "assigned_to"]
     }
     }
</bugzilla>
</bugzilla>
Line 86: Line 87:
     {
     {
<!--
<!--
         "blocks":["1299779"],
         "blocks":"1299779",
         "assigned_to": [],
         "assigned_to": [],
         "status":["NEW","REOPENED","UNCONFIRMED","ASSIGNED","RESOLVED","VERIFIED","CLOSED"],
         "status":["NEW","REOPENED","UNCONFIRMED","ASSIGNED","RESOLVED","VERIFIED","CLOSED"],
-->
-->
         "whiteboard":["[storage-v1.5]"],
         "whiteboard":"[storage-v1.5]",
         "include_fields": "id, summary, status, target_milestone, resolution, assigned_to"
         "include_fields": ["id", "summary", "status", "target_milestone", "resolution", "assigned_to"]
     }
     }
</bugzilla>
</bugzilla>
146

edits