1,698
edits
Add-ons/Reviewers/Content Review Guidelines: Difference between revisions
Add-ons/Reviewers/Content Review Guidelines (view source)
Revision as of 21:52, 1 March 2018
, 1 March 2018→Review Process: clarified request about requesting info from developers
Caitmuenster (talk | contribs) (→Review Process: removed remaining references to expectations for add-on summaries) |
Caitmuenster (talk | contribs) (→Review Process: clarified request about requesting info from developers) |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
3. All information in the listing will be available on the add-on's review page. Developers are '''required''' to include a title and summary to list their extension on AMO. | 3. All information in the listing will be available on the add-on's review page. Developers are '''required''' to include a title and summary to list their extension on AMO. | ||
The developer may also include screenshots, an icon, or an expanded description in their listing. This information is nice to have, but it is not mandatory. | The developer may also include screenshots, an icon, or an expanded description in their listing. This information is nice to have, but it is not mandatory. At this time, we are explicitly recommending that reviewers do not request that the developers include more information in their listing. | ||
4. Check the content of the following fields to make sure it adheres to the [https://www.mozilla.org/about/legal/acceptable-use/ Acceptable Use Policy]: | 4. Check the content of the following fields to make sure it adheres to the [https://www.mozilla.org/about/legal/acceptable-use/ Acceptable Use Policy]: | ||