AMO/Featured Board Process: Difference between revisions

AMO/Featured Board Process (view source)

368 bytes added , 11 September 2024

m

Confirmed users

77

edits

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 Board members must abstain from evaluating any content they may be personally or professionally affiliated with, or competing against.
-== Recommended extension selection process  ==
+== content evaluation process  ==
-First, all currently-recommended extensions will be reviewed to ensure their active user count is growing at an acceptable rate in relation to downloads. Extensions that do not show excellent growth will be de-listed.
+The Mozilla Add-ons team routinely intakes Recommended Extension nominations from the community at large (would you like to nominate a candidate? Email us at '''amo-featured [at] mozilla [dot]''' org) and assembles a vetted list of promising candidates for the board to evaluate. Board contributors are simply asked to install and experience the extension candidates.
+We're primarily focused on evaluating the extension's core functionality (does it do what it promises?), user experience (does it function intuitively? Elegantly?), or any characteristic that's particularly exceptional or unique.
 == Selecting new extensions  ==