2005Offiste/RSS Integration: Difference between revisions

m
notes update
(first notes dump)
 
m (notes update)
Line 7: Line 7:


  .--------.            .---------.    .----------.
  .--------.            .---------.    .----------.
  | feed : | ---------> |        |    | Internal |
  | feed : | ---------> |        |    | Internal |     pretty printing
  '--------'            |        |    /| Handlers |
  '--------'            |        |    /| Handlers | ---> web reader?
                       |  UCT  |  / |          |
                       |  UCT  |  / |          |
  .---------------.    | System  |--/  '----------'
  .---------------.    | System  |--/  '----------'
  | Content Types |    |        |  \  .----.
  | Content Types |    |        |  \  .----.
  | app/rss+xml  | --> |        |  \ |    |
  | app/rss+xml  | --> |        |  \ |    |
  | app/atom+xml  |    |        |    \| OS |
  | app/atom+xml  |    |        |    \| OS | ---> system registered reader
  '---------------'    |        |    |    |
  '---------------'    |        |    |    |
                       '---------'    '----'
                       '---------'    '----'
* beng, chofmann: RSS is just another type of web content, and we should try to provide a transient experience where we display that content in the most appropriate fashion
* beltzner: two primary use cases: 1) mail-like, where each post should be tracked, marked read/unread, archived, searchable, and 2) headline-scanning like where recency is key and posts can be missed; usually for feeds with higher volume of updates.
* beltzner: "Live Bookmark" can be extended to _any_ webpage which has been changed; could mean "watch this page for updates"
*
Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
3,599

edits