Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
2,976
edits
Firefox/Planning/2010-06-09: Difference between revisions
→Questions and Concerns
| (16 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<small>[[Firefox/DeliveryMeetings/2010-06-02|« previous week]] | [[Firefox/DeliveryMeetings|index]] | [[Firefox/DeliveryMeetings/2010-06- | <small>[[Firefox/DeliveryMeetings/2010-06-02|« previous week]] | [[Firefox/DeliveryMeetings|index]] | [[Firefox/DeliveryMeetings/2010-06-16|next week »]]</small> | ||
'''Firefox/Gecko Delivery Meeting Details''' | '''Firefox/Gecko Delivery Meeting Details''' | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* review highlights and notices | * review highlights and notices | ||
* respond to questions and concerns | * respond to questions and concerns | ||
'''Action Items''' | |||
* christian to work with chofmann and socorro team to investigate crash rate spike | |||
* erica and mayumi to finalize comms plan with beltzner | |||
* QA to test with new Flash and new Silverlight | |||
== Schedule & Progress == | == Schedule & Progress == | ||
| Line 29: | Line 33: | ||
** Argument for decoupling decision was made based on potential issues, whereas the negative effects on Linux vendors are known and quantifiable | ** Argument for decoupling decision was made based on potential issues, whereas the negative effects on Linux vendors are known and quantifiable | ||
* Shipping schedule needs to be talked about | * Shipping schedule needs to be talked about | ||
** Still investigating the [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=569104 Cnet bug] and [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562198 bug 562198] | |||
'''[[Releases/Firefox 3.5.11|Firefox 3.5.11]]''' / '''[[Releases/Firefox 3.6.6|Firefox 3.6.6]]''' | '''[[Releases/Firefox 3.5.11|Firefox 3.5.11]]''' / '''[[Releases/Firefox 3.6.6|Firefox 3.6.6]]''' | ||
| Line 38: | Line 43: | ||
* WebM discussion will likely happen shortly | * WebM discussion will likely happen shortly | ||
'''[[Releases/Firefox 3.7a5| | '''[[Releases/Firefox 3.7a5|Mozilla 1.9.3 Developer Preview 5]]''' | ||
* trunk is now feature complete | |||
* just need to get QA signoff and prepare release notes | |||
* QA wants to talk about requirements for ship | |||
'''[[Mobile/Fennec/Fennec1.1|Fennec 1.1 RC]]''' | '''[[Mobile/Fennec/Fennec1.1|Fennec 1.1 RC]]''' | ||
| Line 59: | Line 67: | ||
== Highlights / Notices == | == Highlights / Notices == | ||
<small>''Please add notes for issues you'd like to bring to everyone's attention!''</small> | <small>''Please add notes for issues you'd like to bring to everyone's attention!''</small> | ||
* Build will | * Build | ||
* 3.6.4build6 users will be updated to beta channel {{bug|570797}} | ** Mozilla 1.9.3 Developer Preview 5 will have Linux64 and OSX 10.6 64-bit builds for the first time as part of a release. | ||
** 3.6.4build6 users will be updated to beta channel {{bug|570797}} | |||
** Assuming FF3.5.10 ships Tuesday, RelEng will be powering off FF3.0.x machines before this meeting next week. Details in {{bug|554226}} | |||
== Questions and Concerns == | == Questions and Concerns == | ||
<small>''Please add any questions or concerns you would like discussed at today's meeting.''</small> | <small>''Please add any questions or concerns you would like discussed at today's meeting.''</small> | ||
*Should {{Bug|570774}} block the Alpha 5 release? | |||
** don't think so, not even sure that it should block a beta - secondary UI on a single platform | |||
** does look like there's a fix for this in {{bug|565392}} | |||
*QA Testing Requirements for Alpha 5 | |||
** https://wiki.mozilla.org/Releases/Firefox_3.7a5/Test_Plan#Focus_Areas | |||
** Good number of changes have landed since Alpha 4. Would like to spend some more time with the builds in light of this fact. | |||
** Getting builds tomorrow and and having 1/2 day to test might not be realistic. | |||
** beltzner thinks that there might be some difference of opinion about required quality bar for developer previews | |||
** beltzner and mevans to follow up offline and figure something out | |||
== Press & Public Reactions == | == Press & Public Reactions == | ||
| Line 87: | Line 108: | ||
== Highlights / Notices == | == Highlights / Notices == | ||
* XPCOM registration is changing significantly and in a breaking way, bug 568691. This may mean that we are going to bump the gecko version to 2 for this release. bsmedberg will post more details to md.planning... today? All extensions that use XPCOM components (which is many of them) will need to be updated. | |||
== Questions and Concerns == | == Questions and Concerns == | ||
<small>''Please add any questions or concerns you would like discussed at today's meeting.''</small> | <small>''Please add any questions or concerns you would like discussed at today's meeting.''</small> | ||
* do we have OOPPsie reports for OSX yet? (marcia) | |||
* | ** true, not difficult to do, but to be done by same people on retained layers critical path | ||
** need to decide if we can ship first beta without it | |||
* | * l10n for Firefox 4 Beta 1? | ||
* | |||
** | |||
* | |||