Websites/Processes/Retrospectives/Release: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Mozilla Project Process Retrospective Agenda Template==
==DRAFT: Release Retrospective Agenda Template==


We should be doing post-mortems (ahem, I mean retrospectives) for all Mozilla projects. The purpose is to learn from our mistakes and improve our processes, as well as acknowledge and celebrate our successes.
We should be doing post-mortems (ahem, I mean retrospectives) for all Mozilla projects. The purpose is to learn from our mistakes and improve our processes, as well as acknowledge and celebrate our successes.
Line 10: Line 10:
  </nowiki>
  </nowiki>


Body:
  <nowiki>
  <nowiki>
To get a comprehensive review of all aspects of the project lifecycle, topics are broken down by phase and/or stakeholder.  
To get a comprehensive review of all aspects of the project lifecycle, topics are broken down by phase and/or stakeholder.  
For each item below we will discuss “what went well,” “what can be improved” as well as the specific questions pertaining to each item.
For each item below we will discuss “what went well” and “what can be improved” as well as the specific questions pertaining  
to each item.


Intro
Intro
Line 19: Line 21:


Planning
Planning
* Was there clear requirements and understanding of the app from the start?
* Was there clear requirements and a solid understanding of the app from the start?
* Were goals and success metrics clearly defined?
* Were goals and success metrics clearly defined?


Design
Design
* Did creative provide sufficient user stories?


Resources
Resources
* were roles/responsibilities clear?
* were roles/responsibilities clear?
* Were there sufficient resources     
* Were there sufficient resources to execute all phases smoothly within the project scope and schedule?    


Schedule
Schedule
Line 37: Line 40:
IT/Deployment
IT/Deployment
* Were there any issues getting the app onto stage?
* Were there any issues getting the app onto stage?
* How did launch go?


Communication
Communication
* Were the channels of communication between all the stakeholders?
* Were the channels of communication between all the stakeholders established from the start?
* Was there anything that blocked or hindered communication?


Summary
Summary
Confirmed users
1,052

edits