Confirmed users
2,492
edits
Firefox/Aurora/2011-06-09: Difference between revisions
→Elevated crash level for 6.0a2?
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* Looking at the graphs on https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/products/Firefox, 6.0a2 is way higher than any other build, even nightly | * Looking at the graphs on https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/products/Firefox, 6.0a2 is way higher than any other build, even nightly | ||
* Is this a tools issue? We wouldn't expect Aurora to be an outlier as it is pretty close to beta and central | * Is this a tools issue? We wouldn't expect Aurora to be an outlier as it is pretty close to beta and central | ||
* Analysis - browser crashes (smooney) | |||
** 7.0a1 2011/06/07: 1.69 browser crashes per 100 ADU - https://crash-analysis.mozilla.com/chofmann/20110608/top-7.0a1.html | |||
** 6.0a2 2011/06/07: 1.87 browser crashes per 100 ADU - https://crash-analysis.mozilla.com/chofmann/20110608/top-6.0a2.html | |||
** For browser crashes rates are not that different. | |||
** Looking at number for 6.0a2, there is nothing is significantly high volume. Some crashes that indicate 6.0a2 only but low volume <10 per day. | |||
** One signature - js_XDRScriptAndSubscripts(JSXDRState*, JSScript**) that is NOT on trunk or beta and should have been fixed. Needs some investigation. [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648022 Bug 648022]. Only 19 crashes so not high enough to affect the crash rate. | |||
* Analysis - plugin crashes (smooney) | |||
== Add-on compatibility bump == | == Add-on compatibility bump == | ||