Mozilla2:Image Encoding: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Do we want to support different types of scaling? I'm thinking we may not and may just want a solid good scaling algorithm that all encoders can use. | Do we want to support different types of scaling? I'm thinking we may not and may just want a solid good scaling algorithm that all encoders can use. | ||
== Use == | |||
You would create one by doing: | You would create one by doing: | ||
createInstance("@mozilla.org/image/encoder;2?type=image/png"); | createInstance("@mozilla.org/image/encoder;2?type=image/png"); | ||
Revision as of 01:27, 8 March 2005
Interface
We need to add a new interface. When you read from the stream should we encode just that much? Thoughts?
Something like:
interface imgIEncoder : nsISupports
{
void encode(in imgIContainer input, in nsIOutputStream output);
/* Output width/height */
attribute unsigned long width;
attribute unsigned long height;
/* type of scaling */
const unsigned long SCALE_BAD = 0;
const unsigned long SCALE_NORMAL = 1;
const unsigned long SCALE_GOOD = 2;
attribute unsigned long scaling;
};
encode() method
Should we put width/height on the encode method?
Scaling
Do we want to support different types of scaling? I'm thinking we may not and may just want a solid good scaling algorithm that all encoders can use.
Use
You would create one by doing:
createInstance("@mozilla.org/image/encoder;2?type=image/png");