canmove, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
496
edits
No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
==New workflow for updating users with incompatible add-ons== | ==New workflow for updating users with incompatible add-ons== | ||
Owner: Rob, Chris | Owner: Rob, Chris | ||
* Chris | * Chris met with Limi and updated the wiki page with revised specs | ||
* Limi will follow-up with UX specs shortly | |||
* Once we move to add-ons default to compatible, the majority of incompatible add-ons will be ones with binary components | |||
* Add-ons which are incompatible and the user decides to move forward with the update, we will only disable | |||
* "not now" should suppress the dialog for X days, and not til the next Firefox update | |||
; QA (Ioana Budnar) | ; QA (Ioana Budnar) | ||
| Line 68: | Line 72: | ||
* To Do: | * To Do: | ||
** Continue to revise test plan as feature develops | ** Continue to revise test plan as feature develops | ||
* Questions: | * Questions (answers above): | ||
** Are the binary add-ons the only ones that should be listed in the prompt about unsupported add-ons? | ** Are the binary add-ons the only ones that should be listed in the prompt about unsupported add-ons? | ||
** When the user chooses to continue with the update and ignore the incompatible add-ons, are those add-ons simply disabled, or are they removed from Firefox? | ** When the user chooses to continue with the update and ignore the incompatible add-ons, are those add-ons simply disabled, or are they removed from Firefox? | ||
| Line 78: | Line 82: | ||
; QA (ashughes) | ; QA (ashughes) | ||
* How has the interaction been compared to recent weeks? | * How has the interaction been compared to recent weeks? | ||
** Consensus is that the dev/QA interaction has definitely improved. | |||