Confirmed users
920
edits
MDN/Archives/Kuma/Scripting: Difference between revisions
→Miscellaneous notes
LesOrchard (talk | contribs) |
LesOrchard (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
* Use standalone [https://github.com/visionmedia/ejs embedded JS templates] instead of literals embedded in script? | * Use standalone [https://github.com/visionmedia/ejs embedded JS templates] instead of literals embedded in script? | ||
** Employs code-in-markup instead of markup-in-code, and avoids the need for fancy compiler hijinx | ** Employs code-in-markup instead of markup-in-code, and avoids the need for fancy compiler hijinx | ||
** This is being used in other projects | |||
* Might [https://github.com/laverdet/js-xml-literal js-xml-literals] come in handy? | * Might [https://github.com/laverdet/js-xml-literal js-xml-literals] come in handy? | ||
** [https://github.com/laverdet/js-xml-literal/issues/2 I failed on my first attempt to install], so haven't seen this in action. | ** [https://github.com/laverdet/js-xml-literal/issues/2 I failed on my first attempt to install], so haven't seen this in action. | ||
** This seems experimental; no one else really seems to be using it yet | |||
* Should we get a compiler / language expert in on this for opinions? | * Should we get a compiler / language expert in on this for opinions? | ||
** This smells like dangerous excitement | |||
* Could we port DekiScript directly? (It's open source, right?) | * Could we port DekiScript directly? (It's open source, right?) | ||