MPL-Using Projects: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 110: Line 110:
| [http://echo.nextapp.com/site/echo3/doc/faq MPL 1.1/LGPL 2.1+/GPL 2.0+]
| [http://echo.nextapp.com/site/echo3/doc/faq MPL 1.1/LGPL 2.1+/GPL 2.0+]
| Netscape
| Netscape
|
|-
| [http://www.firebirdsql.org/ FirebirdSQL]
| N
| [http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php?op=doc&id=idpl MPL 1.1]
| The Initial Developer of the code
|  
|  


Line 199: Line 206:
| [http://code.google.com/p/maashaack/ Maashaack]
| [http://code.google.com/p/maashaack/ Maashaack]
| Y
| Y
| [http://www.mozilla.org/MPL MPL 1.1]
| [[http://www.mozilla.org/MPL MPL 1.1/LGPL 2.1+/GPL 2.0+]]
| Netscape
| Netscape
|  
|  
Line 367: Line 374:
| [http://code.google.com/p/vegas/ Vegas]
| [http://code.google.com/p/vegas/ Vegas]
| Y
| Y
| [http://www.mozilla.org/MPL MPL 1.1]
| [http://www.mozilla.org/MPL MPL 1.1/LGPL 2.1+/GPL 2.0+]
| Netscape
| Netscape
|  
|  
Line 390: Line 397:


* the [http://www.freepascal.org/ FreePascal] community, who have regular license troubles because their compiler is GPL/LGPL and much open source Delphi code is MPLed (because Borland used MPL for Jedi). They have a [http://wiki.freepascal.org/licensing document explaining their problems].
* the [http://www.freepascal.org/ FreePascal] community, who have regular license troubles because their compiler is GPL/LGPL and much open source Delphi code is MPLed (because Borland used MPL for Jedi). They have a [http://wiki.freepascal.org/licensing document explaining their problems].
* The maintainer of [http://curl.haxx.se curl], who originally used the MPL and [http://curl.haxx.se/mail/lib-2000-11/0004.html relicensed to a permissive licence] to get GPL compatibility.
* The maintainer of [http://curl.haxx.se curl], who originally used the MPL and [http://curl.haxx.se/docs/history.html relicensed to a permissive licence] to get GPL compatibility.
* The developers of iText in 2009, who wanted to go from LGPL to MPL but [http://sourceforge.net/news/?group_id=15255 had to retain a dual license to keep GPL compatibility]. (They have since gone to AGPL-only for commercial reasons.)
* The developers of iText in 2009, who wanted to go from LGPL to MPL but [http://sourceforge.net/news/?group_id=15255 had to retain a dual license to keep GPL compatibility]. (They have since gone to AGPL-only for commercial reasons.)
* Bjørn Reese and Daniel Stenberg, who [http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/policy/2001/12/12/transition.html would have used the MPL for their projects] if it was GPL-compatible.
* Bjørn Reese and Daniel Stenberg, who [http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/policy/2001/12/12/transition.html would have used the MPL for their projects] if it was GPL-compatible.
1

edit