Auto-tools/Projects/Futurama/2012-11-15: Difference between revisions

Replaced content with "Updated Auto-tools/Projects/Futurama/DevMeeting. Assigned owners to short-term goals."
(Created page with "Responses on notes from the meeting the futurama team had with a few developers on 2012-10-26. = Problems from the Developers = * Number one is no neon support ** '''[Futurama]'...")
 
(Replaced content with "Updated Auto-tools/Projects/Futurama/DevMeeting. Assigned owners to short-term goals.")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Responses on notes from the meeting the futurama team had with a few developers on 2012-10-26.
Updated [[Auto-tools/Projects/Futurama/DevMeeting]]. Assigned owners to short-term goals.
 
= Problems from the Developers =
* Number one is no neon support
** '''[Futurama]''': that is coming (panda boards)
* Windows 8
** '''[Futurama]''': releng (armen) working on that
* Having VMs would be nice - things that people could download so they could repro things
** Download a VM with talos env on it so you can download it and reproduce the issue that talos hit
*** Have a VM with as close to a configuration to what's in production so we can run it similarly to the production environment. The goal isn't to reporoduce the same numbers, but to reporoduce the regression.
** '''[Futurama]''': identified as goal.
* Ability to run tests in parallel -- we want that for running locally.
** reftests should be possible to parallelize they could be the next step after xpcshell (reftests that don't require focus)
** jsreftests is another good candidate for this
** perhaps a method of attack: xpcshell -> jsreftest -> crashtest -> reftest
** '''[Futurama]''': on buildbot, will probably cause a lot of oranges and suck up a lot of time, not a clear win. locally, bugs exist, could be a contributor project, but not a priority compared to other identified goals.
* More C++ tests.
** XUL unit test
** Integration of Gtest, helping make it easier to write tests for pieces that live inside of libXUL
** Needs more work and investigation
** The more information we can provide the better - we show backtraces when we crash that's useful.
** reduces requirements for quick turn around time because you have enough data from one push and you don't need to push again to get more data.
** But if we had profiling stats when we crash
** It would be nice to have tests for some of this low level stuff - someone broke compilation error reporting on windows recently and that was difficult to understand and fix. This could be added to the "fast test suite" idea
** '''[Futurama]''': Identified as a (longer-term) goal.
* Improving quality of results
** i.e. adding profiling with talos
*** '''[Futurama]''': in progress.
 
= Workflow issues =
* Autoland is barely running - it's not something that is being worked on right now.
** Need some method for checking in someting "whenever" - perhaps autoland can do that? For patches that are not time sensitive
** Once the patch is r+ the patch should just land and the test results should show up in bugzilla automatically (the chrome/webkit automation story)
** tbpl results on bug pages
** '''[Futurama]''': identified as goal.
** Orange factor needs an owner to drive the number down
*** '''[Futurama]''': edmorley working on that.
* Code coverage -- taking that further.
** jcranmer has a setup that works on try. It's still a bit hackish but it is working, so that's a beginning. With more polish might be useful.  Should be something to investigate with it.
** http://people.mozilla.org/~choller/firefox/coverage/
** '''[Futurama]''': would be nice, but probably has a low ROI. Generates a lot of data but nothing clearly actionable. To make it useful, it would require a lot of tools and infrastructure. Long-term project that would require a lot of planning. Some goals we *have* identified may advance this on their own.
* ASAN builds - decoder has a way to run ASAN builds, it would be good to get nightly builds with it. So that people can download them and use them. Mostly to run locally.
** '''[Futurama]''': Building them is already possible. This would be a releng project; not much for A-Team to do here.
 
= Bugzilla =
* showed bugzilla dashboards - you can see them on https://bugzilla.allizom.org
** '''[Futurama]''': identified as a goal.
* The new skin is in the Preferences called "mozilla" skin drop down list at https://bugzilla-stage-tip.mozilla.org
** '''[Futurama]''': identified as a goal.
* Making bugzilla faster
** There are changes to the backend to help with this:
*** Better backend hardware
*** Fixing search table inefficiencies
*** try to reduce the unnecessary load on bugzilla from the REST API
** '''[Futurama]''': we're chipping away at this.
 
= Workflow Suggestions =
* Ability to work in git locally and have a gitserver system that takes your pushes and then pushes into hg.
** Someone has code for this -- follow up with Ehsan.
** '''[Futurama]''': Not really A-Team's purview, but in progress supposedly.
 
= Need better docs/blogs about where things are =
* what is mozbase? is it in mozcentral? where is the code?
* how do I do it?
* we need more links to the code from the running applications- make it very obvious.
* (SEO!) ensure our stuff shows up on google
* We should get rid of out of date crap - i.e. standalone talos.
* We should keep the projects page up to date and make it extremely obvious.
** Just delete old/out of date information. If people really want to see history the wiki has a feature to let you view it.
** '''[Futurama]''': most of this was done shortly after the meeting! \o/
Confirmed users
1,927

edits