Update:Remora UI Review/Mockups/Home Page/categorization 2007-07-10/: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
* Second-level categories
* Second-level categories
** Extensions
** Extensions
*** this is where it really starts to split up -- arguably, these could be top level divisions (see apple dashboard widgets as an example)
*** this is where it really starts to split up -- arguably, these could be top level divisions (see apple dashboard widgets as an example);  perhaps some of these can get pulled out to other top-level categories once those categories are revised
*** category names use too much technical language
*** category names use too much technical language
*** divisions, as at the top level, are along technical lines in some cases (interface customizations?)
*** divisions, as at the top level, are along technical lines in some cases (interface customizations?)
** Search Engines
*** should these be broken in sub-categories?


* General thoughts
* General thoughts
Line 20: Line 22:
==Initial Reorganization:==
==Initial Reorganization:==


Really, I ought to have gone through a more systematic approach to the categorization, but for this first attempt at resolving some of the issues, I decided to just go for it.
Really, I ought to have gone through a more systematic approach to the categorization (ie. [http://www.cmscalendar.com/taxo-glossary.html?term=CardSort card sorting], or some other method of taxonomy), but for this first attempt at resolving some of the issues, I decided to just go for it by rewriting some of the category names be clearer and moving some around.  All of this will have to be validated with the list of actual add-ons.


[[Image:categorization_2007-07-10.png]]
[[Image:categorization_2007-07-10.png]]
Confirmed users
1,492

edits