1
edit
Talk:Extension Manager:Addon Update Security: Difference between revisions
Talk:Extension Manager:Addon Update Security (view source)
Revision as of 18:48, 18 July 2007
, 18 July 2007→Update Scenarios: XPI signing
(Question about providing updates without SSL) |
(→Update Scenarios: XPI signing) |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
--[[User:Grimholtz|Grimholtz]] 12:18, 9 July 2007 (PDT) | --[[User:Grimholtz|Grimholtz]] 12:18, 9 July 2007 (PDT) | ||
1. I already sign my XPI files with signtool and my code signing cert which creates the META files with the hash embedded. Will there be a check to see if that is used instead having to also sign the updates.rdf file? | |||
2. If that wouldn't be possible then could the same cert also generate a new updates.rdf file that includes the hash. I could create a new build script to do just that and it would still make everything pretty painless making a release. | |||
--[[User:Sgrayban|Sgrayban]] 11:48, 18 July 2007 (PDT) | |||
== No-SSL downloads == | == No-SSL downloads == | ||