30
edits
Mozilla2:Unified Storage: Difference between revisions
m
→Comments from Axel
| Line 202: | Line 202: | ||
The [http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/#typedliterals RDF primer] mentions all of schema2 datatypes for typed literals. | The [http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/#typedliterals RDF primer] mentions all of schema2 datatypes for typed literals. | ||
Prominent are numbers, like 2.5 vs 2.500 or dates from different timezones. | Prominent are numbers, like 2.5 vs 2.500 or dates from different timezones. | ||
Another important issue I miss is the safeness of the data. If we share application data, the backing store needs to be crash and power-off proof, IMHO. | Another important issue I miss is the safeness of the data. If we share application data, the backing store needs to be crash and power-off proof, IMHO. | ||
Is there any method to prune data, like, what happens if application data changes the scheme? We probably don't want to bloat our database with left overs for all days. What about extension | Is there any method to prune data, like, what happens if application data changes the scheme? We probably don't want to bloat our database with left-overs for all days. What about extension un-installs? | ||
One thing that I still have on my plate is profile migration, like, how would apps like Safari or Opera migrate firefox profiles? We blame MS for obfuscating their internal data and being | One thing that I still have on my plate is profile migration, like, how would apps like Safari or Opera migrate firefox profiles? We blame MS for obfuscating their internal data and being non-interoperable; we don't wanna end up in the same hot spot, right? | ||
=== Comments from Vlad === | === Comments from Vlad === | ||