Confirmed users
226
edits
MathML:Cleanup: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== GFX Glue Layer Removal == | == [DONE] DOM updates == | ||
See {{bug|744783}}. | |||
[fredw]: The known issues are fixed. | |||
== [DONE] GFX Glue Layer Removal == | |||
An important step for MathML is {{bug|663740}}, which will allow to start the work on OpenType MATH table, to support more [[MathML:Fonts|MathML fonts]]. More generally, see {{bug|430829}}, [[Gfx_glue_layer_removal]] and [http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.tech.gfx/browse_thread/thread/90d41db79b03f2fb/8921df6eaa49269c?#8921df6eaa49269c the thread on mozilla.dev.tech.gfx]. | An important step for MathML is {{bug|663740}}, which will allow to start the work on OpenType MATH table, to support more [[MathML:Fonts|MathML fonts]]. More generally, see {{bug|430829}}, [[Gfx_glue_layer_removal]] and [http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.tech.gfx/browse_thread/thread/90d41db79b03f2fb/8921df6eaa49269c?#8921df6eaa49269c the thread on mozilla.dev.tech.gfx]. | ||
== Attribute Mapping into Style == | [fredw]: the main refactoring {{bug|663740}} is done. | ||
== [DONE] Attribute Mapping into Style == | |||
We are using private attributes and pre-defined rules in mathml.css to map some MathML attributes into CSS. This approach shows its limits for length attributes ({{bug|330964}}) and exposes unwanted attributes to the DOM ({{bug|527201}}). We should rewrite this in a cleaner way ({{bug|69409}}). | We are using private attributes and pre-defined rules in mathml.css to map some MathML attributes into CSS. This approach shows its limits for length attributes ({{bug|330964}}) and exposes unwanted attributes to the DOM ({{bug|527201}}). We should rewrite this in a cleaner way ({{bug|69409}}). | ||
== Width Computation == | [fredw]: the private attributes have been removed. | ||
== [DONE] Width Computation == | |||
Our layout engine still has some problems with width computation. See for example {{bug|459363}} or {{bug|415413}}. Should we find a better algorithm? | Our layout engine still has some problems with width computation. See for example {{bug|459363}} or {{bug|415413}}. Should we find a better algorithm? | ||
[fredw]: the main preferred width bugs are fixed. | |||
== Box Model for MathML == | == Box Model for MathML == | ||
The <math> element is implemented as an inline-box, but this gives an incorrect height computation ({{bug|219873}}). We should also allow linebreaking inside <mrow>'s, as specified by the rules of MathML 3 ({{bug|508120}}). | The <math> element is implemented as an inline-box, but this gives an incorrect height computation ({{bug|219873}}). We should also allow linebreaking inside <mrow>'s, as specified by the rules of MathML 3 ({{bug|508120}}). | ||