Web Browser Grand Prix: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(Mark as Outdated) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{OutdatedSpiderMonkey}} | |||
Tom's Hardware Guide publishes a ~semiannual browser review called the '''"Web Browser Grand Prix"''' (WBGP). Mozilla would like to invest more time optimizing for the Grand Prix's high-profile benchmarks: | Tom's Hardware Guide publishes a ~semiannual browser review called the '''"Web Browser Grand Prix"''' (WBGP). Mozilla would like to invest more time optimizing for the Grand Prix's high-profile benchmarks: | ||
| Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
* [http://www.kevs3d.co.uk/dev/canvasmark/ CanvasMark] (Chrome) | * [http://www.kevs3d.co.uk/dev/canvasmark/ CanvasMark] (Chrome) | ||
* [http://webvizbench.com WebVizBench] (IE10) | * [http://webvizbench.com WebVizBench] (IE10) | ||
* [https://www.scirra.com/blog/77/internet-explorer-10-fast-and-native-has-gone-to-other-browsers | * Scirra WebGL 2D: [https://www.scirra.com/blog/77/internet-explorer-10-fast-and-native-has-gone-to-other-browsers 2012 tests], [https://www.scirra.com/blog/144/the-great-html5-gaming-performance-test-2014-edition 2014 tests] | ||
* [http://luic.github.io/WebGL-Performance-Benchmark/ LUIC WebGL 3D] (Firefox) | * [http://luic.github.io/WebGL-Performance-Benchmark/ LUIC WebGL 3D] (Firefox) | ||
* Facebook's [https://github.com/facebook/jsgamebench JSGameBench] (Firefox) | * Facebook's [https://github.com/facebook/jsgamebench JSGameBench] (Firefox) | ||
* [http://www.eembc.org/benchmark/browsing_sl.php EEMBC BrowsingBench] | * [http://www.eembc.org/benchmark/browsing_sl.php EEMBC BrowsingBench] | ||
* [http://www.browserscope.org/security/test BrowserScope Security test] | * [http://www.browserscope.org/security/test BrowserScope Security test] | ||
* [https://github.com/padenot/webaudio-benchmark padenot's webaudio test] ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=882543 bug 882543]) | |||
Tom's Hardware describes their composite scoring: "We switched most of the composite scores from arithmetic mean (average) to geometric mean in order to ensure that every test in each category is given equal weight, regardless of absolute value. In order to minimize the effect of Dromaeo DOM in the final scoring, that test is now counted equally with the three JS tests in the final JavaScript/DOM composite score." | Tom's Hardware describes their composite scoring: "We switched most of the composite scores from arithmetic mean (average) to geometric mean in order to ensure that every test in each category is given equal weight, regardless of absolute value. In order to minimize the effect of Dromaeo DOM in the final scoring, that test is now counted equally with the three JS tests in the final JavaScript/DOM composite score." | ||
| Line 54: | Line 57: | ||
! IE | ! IE | ||
! Opera | ! Opera | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 78: | Line 67: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/web-browser-chrome-25-firefox-19,3459.html March 2013] | ! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/web-browser-chrome-25-firefox-19,3459.html March 2013] | ||
! style="background:# | ! style="background:#bfb;" | Chrome 25 | ||
| Firefox 19 | | Firefox 19 | ||
| IE 10 | | IE 10 | ||
| Line 85: | Line 74: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/firefox-15-safari-6-web-browser,3287.html September 2012] | ! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/firefox-15-safari-6-web-browser,3287.html September 2012] | ||
! style="background:# | ! style="background:#bfb;" | Chrome 20 | ||
| Firefox 15 | | Firefox 15 | ||
| IE 9 | | IE 9 | ||
| Line 92: | Line 81: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/windows-7-chrome-20-firefox-13-opera-12,3228.html July 2012] | ! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/windows-7-chrome-20-firefox-13-opera-12,3228.html July 2012] | ||
! style="background:# | ! style="background:#bfb;" | Chrome 20 | ||
| Firefox 13 | | Firefox 13 | ||
| IE 9 | | IE 9 | ||
| Line 102: | Line 91: | ||
| Firefox 11 | | Firefox 11 | ||
| IE 9 | | IE 9 | ||
! style="background:# | ! style="background:#bfb;" | Opera 11.61 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 127: | Line 116: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/web-browser-performance-standard-html5,3013.html August 2011] | ! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/web-browser-performance-standard-html5,3013.html August 2011] | ||
! style="background:# | ! style="background:#bfb;" | Chrome 13 | ||
| Firefox 6 | | Firefox 6 | ||
| IE 9 | | IE 9 | ||
| Line 134: | Line 123: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/opera-firefox-chrome,2976.html July 2011] | ! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/opera-firefox-chrome,2976.html July 2011] | ||
! style="background:# | ! style="background:#bfb;" | Chrome 12 | ||
| Firefox 5 | | Firefox 5 | ||
| IE 9 | | IE 9 | ||
| Line 143: | Line 132: | ||
| Chrome 10 | | Chrome 10 | ||
| Firefox 4 | | Firefox 4 | ||
! style="background:# | ! style="background:#bfb;" | IE 9 | ||
| Opera 11.01 | | Opera 11.01 | ||
| Line 150: | Line 139: | ||
| Chrome 10 | | Chrome 10 | ||
| Firefox 3.6 | | Firefox 3.6 | ||
! style="background:# | ! style="background:#bfb;" | IE 9 | ||
| Opera 11.01 | | Opera 11.01 | ||
| Line 158: | Line 147: | ||
| Firefox 3.6 | | Firefox 3.6 | ||
| IE 9 | | IE 9 | ||
! style="background:# | ! style="background:#bfb;" | Opera 10.60 | ||
|- | |- | ||
! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/firefox-chrome-opera,2558.html March 2010] | ! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/firefox-chrome-opera,2558.html March 2010] | ||
! style="background:# | ! style="background:#bfb;" | Chrome 4 | ||
| Firefox 3.6 | | Firefox 3.6 | ||
| IE 8 | | IE 8 | ||
| Opera 10.50 | | Opera 10.50 | ||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 21:08, 27 April 2021
Tom's Hardware Guide publishes a ~semiannual browser review called the "Web Browser Grand Prix" (WBGP). Mozilla would like to invest more time optimizing for the Grand Prix's high-profile benchmarks:
- Browsermark (Chrome)
- Peacekeeper (Chrome)
WBGP also includes:
- Purdue's JSBench (Chrome)
- RIABench JavaScript (Chrome)
- Dromaeo (Firefox)
- WebXPRT 2013 (Firefox)
- Impact HTML5 (IE10)
- KaizouMark CSS (Chrome)
- CanvasMark (Chrome)
- WebVizBench (IE10)
- Scirra WebGL 2D: 2012 tests, 2014 tests
- LUIC WebGL 3D (Firefox)
- Facebook's JSGameBench (Firefox)
- EEMBC BrowsingBench
- BrowserScope Security test
- padenot's webaudio test (bug 882543)
Tom's Hardware describes their composite scoring: "We switched most of the composite scores from arithmetic mean (average) to geometric mean in order to ensure that every test in each category is given equal weight, regardless of absolute value. In order to minimize the effect of Dromaeo DOM in the final scoring, that test is now counted equally with the three JS tests in the final JavaScript/DOM composite score."
Contacts
- Engineering Manager: Naveed Ihsanullah
- Developers:
- Jan De Mooij
- Hannes Verschore
- Boris Zbarsky
- Sean Stangl
- PM: Chris Peterson
Bugs
- WBGP meta-bug 933949: dependency tree
- Browsermark bugs
- Peacekeeper bugs
- Google tracks its Grand Prix benchmarks in Chrome meta-bug 258103.
47 Total; 47 Open (100%); 0 Resolved (0%); 0 Verified (0%);
Results
| Date | Chrome | Firefox | IE | Opera |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 2013 | Chrome 27 | Firefox 22 | IE 10 | Opera 15 |
| March 2013 | Chrome 25 | Firefox 19 | IE 10 | Opera 12.14 |
| September 2012 | Chrome 20 | Firefox 15 | IE 9 | Opera 12.02 |
| July 2012 | Chrome 20 | Firefox 13 | IE 9 | Opera 11.62 |
| April 2012 | Chrome 18 | Firefox 11 | IE 9 | Opera 11.61 |
| February 2012 | Chrome 17 | Firefox 10 | IE 9 | Opera 11.61 |
| January 2012 | Chrome 16 | Firefox 9 | IE 9 | Opera 11.60 |
| September 2011 | Chrome 14 | Firefox 7 | IE 9 | Opera 11.51 |
| August 2011 | Chrome 13 | Firefox 6 | IE 9 | Opera 11.50 |
| July 2011 | Chrome 12 | Firefox 5 | IE 9 | Opera 11.50 |
| April 2011 | Chrome 10 | Firefox 4 | IE 9 | Opera 11.01 |
| March 2011 | Chrome 10 | Firefox 3.6 | IE 9 | Opera 11.01 |
| July 2010 | Chrome 5 | Firefox 3.6 | IE 9 | Opera 10.60 |
| March 2010 | Chrome 4 | Firefox 3.6 | IE 8 | Opera 10.50 |