Mozilla.org/Redesign/Questionnaire: Difference between revisions

Line 40: Line 40:
** We're open to advice.  There's a lot of content on www.mozilla.org (although we're reducing that through an archiving campaign) and a lot of content across the Mozilla community and it's not clear what's the best way to make that content easy to access.
** We're open to advice.  There's a lot of content on www.mozilla.org (although we're reducing that through an archiving campaign) and a lot of content across the Mozilla community and it's not clear what's the best way to make that content easy to access.
* Do you like fixed width or liquid layouts? Why? What resolution do you want to support (if fixed)?
* Do you like fixed width or liquid layouts? Why? What resolution do you want to support (if fixed)?
** We're open to feedback. One concern is that however we design the site that people can be able to use it on mobile devices. Our target is for general, Fennec-like mobile browsers (as in, the Real Web™), however.
** Liquid, liquid, liquid. We can take advantage of media queries to optimize for wider widths, but the base layout should work in narrow windows windows. One related concern is that people be able to use it on mobile devices. Our target is for general, Fennec-like mobile browsers (as in, the Real Web™), however.
* What words (category labels) do you feel would be meaningful to your audience?
* What words (category labels) do you feel would be meaningful to your audience?
** Openness, community, freedom, collaboration, passion
** Openness, community, freedom, collaboration, passion
* What content is searchable? Will there be metadata for content?
* What content is searchable? Will there be metadata for content?
** Right now, all content is searchable and most of it (if not all) has been indexed by Google over the years.
** Right now, all content is searchable and most of it (if not all) has been indexed by Google over the years. There is no internal metadata.


== Content ==
== Content ==
Confirmed users
104

edits