1,107
edits
Support/PlatformEngineering: Difference between revisions
→Option 1: continue with Tiki
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
= Option 1: continue with Tiki = | = Option 1: continue with Tiki = | ||
One of the rationales for upgrading Tiki to current was to enable us to rewrite parts of the code as we see fit. This includes improving existing sections of core code and modules. | |||
== Refactoring == | == Refactoring == | ||
| Line 26: | Line 28: | ||
* Impact of refactoring: choose areas that will have the biggest impact for users and developers | * Impact of refactoring: choose areas that will have the biggest impact for users and developers | ||
* Ease of refactoring: While this would never be the only criteria, there is certainly value in choosing low hanging fruit | * Ease of refactoring: While this would never be the only criteria, there is certainly value in choosing low hanging fruit | ||
= Option 2: Redevelop SUMO platform = | = Option 2: Redevelop SUMO platform = | ||