User:Automatedtester/FennecDriver: Difference between revisions

User:Automatedtester/FennecDriver (view source)

Revision as of 10:57, 27 September 2011

20 bytes added , 27 September 2011

→‎Option 1

Automatedtester

Confirmed users

753

edits

Revision as of 10:40, 27 September 2011 (view source) Automatedtester (talk \| contribs) (Created page with " =Summary= Selenium WebDriver currently has very good support for mobile browsers that are built into the OS. There is good support for both iOS and Android. This is an investiga...")		Revision as of 10:57, 27 September 2011 (view source) Automatedtester (talk \| contribs) (→‎Option 1) Newer edit →
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Server Architecture The server is going to be a Jetty Server on the device with servlets to handle the different commands available in the JSON Wire Protocol. This approach also means that we can use the Selenium Grid to parallelise since devices can be added and the central hub would understand and forward the commands to this server.		Server Architecture The server is going to be a Jetty Server on the device with servlets to handle the different commands available in the JSON Wire Protocol. This approach also means that we can use the Selenium Grid to parallelise since devices can be added and the central hub would understand and forward the commands to this server.

	This would then translate commands to hook into the browser. Approach being investigated for proxy to browser communication can be found [[Auto-tools/Projects/JSON_Protocol_Testing\|here]]. The approach, at time of writing this, that appears to be the the best is a hybrid of 2 and 3		This would then translate commands to hook into the browser. Approach being investigated for proxy to browser communication can be found [[Auto-tools/Projects/JSON_Protocol_Testing\|here]]. The approach, at time of writing this, that appears to be the the best is a hybrid of 2 and 3[[File:option1.jpg]]