Calendar:QA Feature Specification: Difference between revisions

Line 7: Line 7:


==Wish List==
==Wish List==
*recurrencies
 
** Inline editing an occurrence of a recurring event creates an exeption of the recurrency pattern and changes this occurrence only.
* editing recurring events
** If recurring events with exceptions are changed ("All events"), the exception is not changed. This applies to times, titles, descriptions, alarms, attendees, ...
* copy/paste recurring events
** copy/paste recurring events ...
** hitting del after selecting one occurrence
** hitting del after selecting all occurrences of an recurring event
* tasks
* tasks
** there is a [[Calendar:Task Support|Feature Specification for Tasks]]. I'm not sure if this has been agreed on. It does not show the actual behaviour, though.
** there is a [[Calendar:Task Support|Feature Specification for Tasks]]. I'm not sure if this has been agreed on. It does not show the actual behaviour, though.
** can have start date/can have due date/(can have duration?)
** are shown in main view if option("Tasks in View") is set
** are shown in main view from start date until due date OR
** are shown in main view from start date until [start date + duration] OR
** are shown in main view from [due date - duration] until due date
** can have alarms relative to start date/relative to due date/relative to [due date - duration]
** tasks can be converted to events in the dialog
* email invitations
* email invitations
** should updated email invitations overwrite existing entries in the calendar?
** see [[Calendar:Feature_Implementations:iTIP-iMIP:Current_iTIP_Design]]
* printing
* printing
** a weekly view, similar to the weekly view provided in the google calendar
** a weekly view, similar to the weekly view provided in the google calendar
** generate pdf-files as result of a print preview (see google calendar)
** generate pdf-files as result of a print preview (see google calendar)
--Please correct the above if I am mistaken. I am aware that task semantics are currently discussed in the newsgroup. I just put down some possible solutions. --Sebo
188

edits