canmove, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
4,747
edits
QA/Automation/Meetings/121008: Difference between revisions
→Highlights
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
= Highlights = | = Highlights = | ||
* | * Experience in our development of the first WebRTC tests | ||
** Initial landing of Makefiles should be handled by our own to ensure an as fast as possible landing ({{bug|795367}}) | |||
*** Consider multiple iterations due to try failures | |||
*** Take into account that no real devices will be available for build bot machines (faked media) | |||
** It is hard to write tests for APIs which are changing drastically | |||
*** Faked media patch landed Tuesday last week (earlier no in-tree tests were possible) | |||
*** Handling of prefed-off features (tests will have to take the pref into account) | |||
** Usage of common modules to ease the writing of tests | |||
*** Creating a PeerConnection object and establishing the connection is quite complex | |||
*** Handling of default settings for each test | |||
** Test creation | |||
*** Lots of features have still not been implemented - figured out while coding on tests | |||
** Results | |||
*** Even no tests have been checked in yet, we identified a couple of bugs like {{bug|798323}}, {{bug|798873}} | |||
= Goals Overview = | = Goals Overview = | ||