Confirmed users
497
edits
Mozilla 2/StatusMeetings/2008-03-12: Difference between revisions
Mozilla 2/StatusMeetings/2008-03-12 (view source)
Revision as of 18:23, 12 March 2008
, 12 March 2008→Discussion: Add notes from meeting
(→Discussion: Mercurial sub-tree ideas. SpiderMonkey sans NSPR.) |
(→Discussion: Add notes from meeting) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
* [[MDC:Mercurial/Desired_Features]] being contracted out | * [[MDC:Mercurial/Desired_Features]] being contracted out | ||
** bsmedberg has the [http://hg.mozilla.org/users/bsmedberg_mozilla.com/hghooks/ server hooks] to collect push revision/time/user... should we ask IT to install this on mozilla-central now? | ** bsmedberg has the [http://hg.mozilla.org/users/bsmedberg_mozilla.com/hghooks/ server hooks] to collect push revision/time/user... should we ask IT to install this on mozilla-central now? | ||
** Are there features we could add to Mercurial to support sharing the core platform code amongst the various applications? | ** Are there features we could add to Mercurial to support sharing the core platform code amongst the various applications? (Vlad mentioned 'forest' extension to hg.) | ||
** Are there features we could add to Mercurial to allow people to work on SpiderMonkey with hg without checking out all the rest of the tree? | ** Are there features we could add to Mercurial to allow people to work on SpiderMonkey with hg without checking out all the rest of the tree? | ||
* Is it practical to remove the dependency of SpiderMonkey on NSPR? If we had to lose some features — multi-threaded operation, say — this would still be helpful to some users (Taras, say). | * Is it practical to remove the dependency of SpiderMonkey on NSPR? If we had to lose some features — multi-threaded operation, say — this would still be helpful to some users (Taras, say). (Bsmedberg says if 'threadsafe' is not enabled, then it shouldn't need NSPR at all.) | ||