Jetpack/e10s: Difference between revisions

Line 6: Line 6:
** [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1004833 resurect cfx --e10s and add a package.json flag]
** [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1004833 resurect cfx --e10s and add a package.json flag]
* the more i learn about E10S, the less i'm sure in my first proposed approach
* the more i learn about E10S, the less i'm sure in my first proposed approach
** (attach small Frame Script that forwards messages across boundaries)  
** (was: attach small Frame Script that forwards messages across boundaries)  
** afaict, the original assumption when designing jetpack APIs was that a DOM window was going to be a barrier between Parent and Child processes (not true)
** afaict, the original assumption when designing jetpack APIs was that a DOM window was going to be a barrier between Parent and Child processes (not true)
** different code paths for xul:iframes not inside tabs? (they are not remote)
** different code paths for xul:iframes not inside tabs? (they are not remote)
Confirmed users
122

edits