Firefox 3.6/PushState Security Review: Difference between revisions

Line 83: Line 83:
* file:// uris have odd origin rules. We certainly don't want to allow a file to pushState() to some URL it can't otherwise load, navigate to a cooperating server which goes back to the inaccessible file. Maybe our current same-origin checks embody the correct rules.
* file:// uris have odd origin rules. We certainly don't want to allow a file to pushState() to some URL it can't otherwise load, navigate to a cooperating server which goes back to the inaccessible file. Maybe our current same-origin checks embody the correct rules.
** jst and dveditz wouldn't mind not supporting the <url> parameter at all for file: uris, sicking thinks the current same-origin rules do the right thing.
** jst and dveditz wouldn't mind not supporting the <url> parameter at all for file: uris, sicking thinks the current same-origin rules do the right thing.
* popState should not count as a user interaction for allowing popups.
Bureaucrats, canmove, Confirmed users
647

edits